Louis Rossmann

451 readers
1 users here now

Louis Rossmann Community on Lemmy.world: For fans/supporters of Louis Rossmann and his work

About Louis Rossmann

Louis Rossmann is a repair shop owner and a vocal supporter of the Right To Repair movement. He runs a YouTube channel with a variety of content - from board repair videos, to news and updates in the technology space.

His insightful and reasonable opinions on technology and product ownership tend to attract a lot of attention.

Community Guidelines

  1. Be nice
  2. Respect others' perspectives
  3. No advertising
  4. Follow the rules of the instance we're hosted on: https://mastodon.world/about

Interested in being a moderator for this community? Positions are currently open.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

Timestamps and Generated Summary Below:


Video Description:

Links:

  1. https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/Mozilla_introduces_TOS_to_Firefox
  2. https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/Mozilla
  3. https://librewolf.net/

Timestamps:

  1. 00:00:00 - tl;dr solution use librewolf
  2. 00:00:52 - my tl;dr thoughts
  3. 00:01:08 - what mozilla did
  4. 00:02:28 - mozilla crashed archive.org.....
  5. 00:03:03 - Louis gets trolled by a monster
  6. 00:03:56 - firefox' removes statement on not selling personal data.
  7. 00:04:40 - terms were changed without explicitly alerting users
  8. 00:05:08 - mozilla did this at the WORST POSSIBLE TIME
  9. 00:07:05 - the worst communication policy
  10. 00:07:14 - California consumer protection act
  11. 00:08:03 - The suspicious part mozilla put in
  12. 00:08:26 - What is "selling data" ?
  13. 00:08:54 - Existing business practices exist in grey areas to CCPA
  14. 00:12:46 - Just use librewolf to avoid all this....
  15. 00:16:27 - Privacy policy is still fairly strong
  16. 00:17:20 - How money for nothing destroys people & companies

Generated Summary:

This YouTube video analyzes Mozilla's recent controversial changes to its terms of service and privacy policy, arguing that the company's financial success has led to complacency and poor communication.

Main Topic: The video critiques Mozilla's handling of its terms of service update, focusing on the poor communication, the ambiguity surrounding data usage, and the potential conflict with the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).

Key Points:

  • Poor Communication: Mozilla's announcement and explanation of the changes were poorly worded, confusing, and caused significant user backlash. The changes were implemented before users were notified.
  • Ambiguous Data Usage: The updated terms, while not explicitly stating Mozilla sells user data, created the impression that it might be doing so, particularly in light of the CCPA's broad definition of "selling data." The video highlights the existing practice of sharing data with partners like Google in exchange for financial compensation.
  • Financial Complacency: The core argument is that Mozilla's substantial financial stability (largely from Google's payments to be the default search engine) has led to a lack of urgency and accountability. High executive salaries are cited as evidence of this complacency.
  • Alternative Browser: The video promotes LibraWolf, an open-source fork of Firefox that removes telemetry and sponsored content, as a privacy-focused alternative.
  • CCPA Compliance: The video discusses the CCPA and how Mozilla's practices, particularly its data sharing with Google, might fall into a gray area of compliance.

Highlights:

  • Comparison of Mozilla's old and new FAQ pages regarding data selling, showing the removal of the "we don't sell your data" promise.
  • Analysis of the CCPA's definition of "selling data," demonstrating how Mozilla's existing practices could be interpreted as violating it.
  • Discussion of Mozilla's revenue streams, emphasizing the reliance on Google's payments and investment income.
  • Contrast between Mozilla's approach and Brave's proactive marketing campaign to address ad-blocker issues.
  • The presenter's personal preference for LibraWolf due to its default privacy settings.
  • The presenter's assertion that Mozilla's problems stem from financial success leading to atrophied communication and responsiveness.

About Channel:

I started as a studio repair technician at Avatar & started a Macbook component level logic board repair business. This channel shows repair & data recovery work & shows how to perform these repairs step by step. There are many outside forces that make it hard to fix things now; willful actions from manufacturers to limit access to parts & schematics. I talked about this to try and spark mainstream recognition of the "Right to Repair" movement.

I realized that restrictions placed on repair were just a canary-in the-coal-mine for many of the anti-ownership, anti-consumer practices that would become common in every industry, which I discuss & try to push back against every day.

2
 
 

Just an idea, but it would be cool to have https://boards.rossmanngroup.com/ part of the Fediverse

3
 
 

Welcome! This page is very large and there are many steps, please take your time. If you would like to edit (you're welcome to fix errors even without an account!), please read this first. Thank you!^[[1] https://wiki.futo.org/wiki/FUTO:About]

Preface

Dedication

Thank you to Tim Gilles, aka Slipperman, whose remarks on what makes someone a “real professional” stuck with me for a lifetime. I listened to Tim on the mixerman radio show. Tim wanted to demystify his craft in a way that anyone could understand; that would inspire EVERYONE to pick up a microphone & a tape machine and give it a shot themselves. He did this with his own “unique” writing style. His work inspired me to do the same with everything I’ve done, from board repair to self-managed servers. Tim passed away two years ago. I hope his legacy lives on through everyone who tries to open doors for the next generation rather than gatekeep information via ego inflating elitism.

Picture of Tim Gilles, aka Slipperman:

Intro

I started using GNU/Linux in 2002, back when I saved up the $79.99 necessary to buy SuSE Linux 8.1 Professional as a boxed set from the Best Buy across the street from the Staten Island mall for my 14th birthday. I started hosting my own servers in 2005, and put together systems for my own business’ use since early 2011. I didn’t do everything outlined here immediately; it was slowly built piece by piece over a long time. I never documented it in a way that would allow my grandma to use it. In 22 years, I can’t remember reading GNU/Linux documentation that felt like it was designed for normal people. That’s what I’m looking to do here.

Image of SuSE Linux 8.1 Professional:

From 2002 to the present, two things remain true:

-You can do cool things with GNU/Linux.

-These cool things are hidden behind a labyrinth of

  • Half baked software.
  • Horrible UI.
  • Forum elitists & gaslighting assholes who will make you think YOU’RE the crazy one for expecting things to work.
  • People that will tell you to “RTFM” with no regard for whether that documentation actually works.
  • black boxes. I mean literally hidden behind actual black boxes. For six months. Unfixed. On the stable version of a server operating system (that bug is present in 24.10 long-term-stable even today).

So much of the open source user experience is not designed for normal people. Whether it was using NDISwrapper 20 years ago to get wifi to work or messing with SCSI emulation to burn a CD, GNU/Linux is pain. It’s all pain.

It’s painful enough that people will happily trade their data, sovereignty, privacy, and their rights to avoid ever having to deal with it; and I can’t blame them.

This has to change. As of 2024, most of you live your life:

  1. Dependent on closed source software.
  2. Running on someone else’s server where you can be kicked off at any time.
  3. Forced into forced arbitration or your device won’t work anymore.
  4. With no privacy.
  5. Training AI with your creations.

Now is a time like no other for you to feel empowered to build systems that you control & understand.

My goal with this guide is not to tell you the way you HAVE to do something, or to imply that my way is the best. My goal is to inspire you by showing you what’s possible. You don’t have to be a computer engineer or someone with an IQ of 160 to figure this all out. And, admittedly, to inspire capable developers to look at the pain points scattered throughout this guide (of which there are many) and decide “enough is enough; let’s make this better”.

The fun here is in building your own system, your own way. This is my sovereign cloud; there are many like it, but this one is mine. I can’t wait to see how you build yours.


View edit history of this page.^[[2] https://wiki.futo.org/index.php?title=Introduction_to_a_Self_Managed_Life:a_13_hour%26_28_minute_presentation_by_FUTO_software&action=history]


Edit: format, added missing quotes on sections/titles/points

4
 
 

Highlight - 9:40.825


Sources from video description:

  1. https://web.archive.org/web/20240000000000*/https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/31/nyregion/peanut-squirrel-pet-seized.html
  2. https://extapps.dec.ny.gov/docs/wildlife_pdf/1801animaldangerhealthwelfare.pdf
  3. https://govt.westlaw.com/nycrr/Document/I3783ab1bc22411dd80c2c6f42ff0193c?viewType=FullText&originationContext=documenttoc&transitionType=CategoryPageItem&contextData=(sc.Default)&bhcp=1
  4. https://www.today.com/news/peanut-the-squirrel-controversy-explained-rcna178506

Key Points:

  1. Urban Living Realities: Life in NYC can be challenging, with high rent and security concerns, but it also fosters resilience and community.
  2. Crime Perception vs. Reality: While crime is prevalent, the experiences shared reveal a nuanced understanding of urban life beyond headlines.
  3. Cameras vs. Community: Surveillance may not solve problems; true community safety comes from relationships and understanding.
  4. Connection Over Class: The narrator feels closer to those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds than to affluent peers, emphasizing shared struggles and experiences.
  5. Humor in Hardship: Using humor to discuss difficult experiences helps cope with challenges, making the narrative relatable.
  6. Identity Formation: Personal growth and identity are deeply intertwined with the environment, as seen in the narrator’s journey from a broke teenager to a successful entrepreneur.
  7. Justice and Enforcement: The disparity in how laws are enforced highlights societal priorities and critiques the system’s focus on minor offenses over significant issues.

Short Summary

  1. The speaker humorously reflects on living in a $2,200 studio apartment in New York City, sharing exchanges with their landlord and neighbor about package thefts and challenges in a high-crime area.
  2. The landlord expresses concern over stolen packages and [Louis] suggests installing security cameras, while the neighbor struggles with spelling the speaker's name and mentions missing packages.
  3. The speaker highlights the irony of thieves targeting boxes containing generic cat litter, emphasizing the absurdity of the situation.
  4. They reminisce about their 14 years in the neighborhood, noting that despite challenges, living in NYC provided invaluable experiences and opportunities.
  5. The speaker reflects on their journey from a $400 apartment to their current rent, appreciating the vibrant community and unique lifestyle.
  6. They discuss feeling a mutual understanding with noisy neighbors, contrasting it with the exclusion felt in more affluent areas.
  7. The speaker recounts their teenage years of limited resources and working stealthily in a park to build a business, achieving success with a store and a million YouTube subscribers.
  8. Despite their accomplishments, they chose to remain in their original neighborhood, valuing community over the allure of a more upscale lifestyle.
  9. They express frustration with the local authorities' focus on seizing pets while ignoring more pressing issues like flood mitigation.
  10. The speaker shares personal anecdotes about theft, including having cat litter stolen, and critiques state regulations regarding animal control, emphasizing that squirrels are not dangerous animals.
5
 
 

Key Points

  1. Forced Arbitration Issues: Forced arbitration often strips consumers of their ability to seek justice in court, allowing companies to escape accountability. This affects trust in consumer rights.
  2. Misrepresentation Consequences: Selling a product that doesn’t match its description (like a car that’s a lawnmower) highlights the need for stricter regulations to protect consumers from deceptive practices.
  3. Profitability vs. Ethics: Steam’s choice to revert its policy illustrates that companies can act ethically and still maintain profitability, challenging the notion that profit comes at the expense of consumer rights.
  4. Corporate Accountability: When companies voluntarily improve policies without external pressure, it reflects a commitment to accountability and ethical behavior, fostering goodwill among consumers.
  5. Effective Communication: Shorter, concise videos can capture attention and convey messages quickly, appealing to audiences with limited time while still informing them.
  6. Consumer Awareness: Raising awareness about corporate practices helps consumers make informed decisions and holds companies accountable, contributing to a healthier marketplace.
  7. Positive Change in Industry: Steam’s decision could inspire other companies to reassess their policies, promoting a culture of consumer-first practices across various industries.

Pinned by Louis Rossmann

@flixgribv | 2 days ago

Please don't do shorts, I don't watch any of them and don't want to start doing it

Louis Rossmann | @rossmanngroup | 2 days ago

Short video means world is getting better. Long video means world is getting worse. Pray for shorts. Nothing but shorts.

Screenshot:

6
 
 

I love Louis and I've been following his videos for a long time. What he does is supremely important to our messed up society.

But here's the thing: for the past few months, I've had the distinct feeling than each of Louis' videos is slightly more unhinged than the previous one.

I mean I'm fully aware Louis' videos are not mainstream, and until recently, I've always felt there was a clear method to the randomness. But lately, it¨s been more randomness than method for me, and it's reached a point where I feel it's doing a disservice to the causes of right to repair and sovereign ownership.

Am I the only one who feels this way?

I really hate to come out saying this, but I really think there's something going on with Louis, and beyond the causes he fights for on our behalf - and goodness knows I'm eternally grateful for what he's achieved - I'm honestly a bit worried for him.

7
 
 

Summary

  1. The speaker lists four things that should not be named, including Voldemort from Harry Potter.
  2. A controversial figure is discussed in relation to a mobile repair subreddit and a New York state government decision negatively impacting their business.
  3. A video application called Gray J is introduced, designed to help users follow creators across different platforms while maintaining privacy.
  4. The speaker praises Linus from Linus Tech Tips for his video series "DeGoogle Your Life," which highlights alternatives to big tech services that invade privacy.
  5. Linus's recent ad-free YouTube video was removed for alleged community guideline violations, reflecting broader issues with YouTube's priorities.
  6. The speaker recalls a similar incident involving another content creator, emphasizing the challenges faced by those who speak out against big tech practices.
  7. A YouTuber relying on advertising revenue had a video deleted due to community guideline violations, promoting unpaid open-source software.
  8. The speaker questions whether the deletion of this video is coincidental, especially since it addressed reducing reliance on Google services.
  9. The speaker calls for community support for the YouTuber and curiosity about the implications of Google's actions on both the YouTuber and the mentioned software.
  10. The video concludes with a humorous note about learning and understanding the situation better.

Key Points

  1. Censorship Concerns: The removal of Linus’s video for discussing privacy tools highlights the ongoing issue of censorship on major platforms. This raises questions about the motivations behind such actions.
  2. Promoting Alternatives: Linus’s commitment to promoting non-proprietary software showcases the importance of alternatives in a world dominated by data-hungry corporations. This could empower users to reclaim their privacy.
  3. Community Impact: The tech community’s response to Linus’s video removal will be crucial in advocating for transparency and fairness in content moderation practices across platforms.
  4. User Empowerment: By educating viewers on privacy tools, Linus is empowering them to take control of their digital lives, which is vital in today’s data-driven landscape.
  5. Integrity Over Profit: Linus’s choice to feature software that doesn’t sponsor him demonstrates his integrity and commitment to user welfare over financial gain, making him a trustworthy figure in tech.
  6. Long-term Implications: The backlash faced by Linus may have broader implications for content creators discussing sensitive topics, impacting future discussions on privacy and data rights.
  7. Advocating for Change: The situation calls for a collective effort within the tech community to push back against unjust platform policies, ensuring creators can advocate for user rights without fear of repercussions.

Pinned by Louis Rossmann

Comment:

@gnuffe7778 | 4 hours ago

Why do you have shades on inside?

Louis reply:

@rossmanngroup | 6 hours ago (edited)

Why do you not?

Break the conditioning. Stop following societal norms that don't benefit you. Stop watching ads. Stop going into debt for consumer luxuries that don't improve life. Stop subscribing to everything. Stop accepting cars that spy on you to sell you ads and increase your insurance.. Stop accepting DRM'd media. Stop buying pearsonvue textbooks new.

Stop accepting the premise that rose colored glasses cannot be worn indoors!

Be your own man. Be the unreasonable man.

"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man."

George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman

Right to privacy

Right to repair

Right to wear rose colored sunglasses; even indoors.

SCOTT STORCH FOUGHT VALIANTY FOR THIS RIGHT TWENTY YEARS AGO; I WILL NOT LET IT DIE ON MY WATCH!

Screenshot of Pinned Comment:


Scott Spencer Storch is an American record producer and songwriter. Storch began his career as part of Philadelphia-based hip hop band the Roots, which he joined as a keyboardist prior to the release of their 1993 album, Organix. He provided the keyboard riff and co-produced Dr. Dre's 1999 single "Still D.R.E.," and contributed in a similar role to the rapper's productions during late 1990s. Storch expanded his solo production work into the 2000s; he was credited on five Billboard Hot 100-number one singles—Beyoncé's "Baby Boy," Terror Squad's "Lean Back," 50 Cent's "Candy Shop," Mario's "Let Me Love You" and Chris Brown's "Run It!"—among other similarly successful chart entries throughout the remaining decade. Storch has been nominated for four Grammy Awards.

8
 
 

Summary

  1. The speaker operates a repair business in New York City and reflects on the challenges of finding a new location in a cramped 650 square foot space with 12 employees.
  2. They compare their situation to chickens needing more space to avoid pecking at each other and lament the loss of small businesses replaced by chain stores.
  3. In 2019, they documented their search for commercial space, noting exorbitant rental prices, such as $75,000 for a slightly larger space.
  4. The speaker shares personal experiences tied to local shops, highlighting the unique charm of small businesses that have disappeared due to rising costs.
  5. They express nostalgia for a city that has significantly changed over the years, with a particular focus on the impact of commercial mortgage-backed securities on the city.
  6. The speaker discusses how rising rents lead to lower property valuations, triggering financial crises for property owners and resulting in vacant buildings.
  7. They highlight a dramatic drop in property values, citing an example of a building that sold for $332 million in 2006, now valued at only $8.5 million.
  8. The speaker warns against misconceptions that success is easily replicable, emphasizing that circumstances vary greatly among businesses.
  9. They reflect on their journey from starting a small business to facing the challenges of rising commercial rents in New York City, expressing sadness over the current state of the city.
  10. The speaker hopes for a revival of opportunities for aspiring entrepreneurs, advocating for a return to a vibrant community filled with unique shops and services.

Screenshot of Pinned Comment:

Pinned by Louis Rossmann

Comment:

@classicclassi6146 | 2 weeks ago (edited)

Being in a world intimidated by online resumes being rejected and everyone blaming you for not being perfect, hearing you tout your business success makes you feel kinda good knowing being talented and capable can go to the head of the line over nepotism or recruitability

Reply:

@rossmanngroup | 2 weeks ago

I've never been able to get a real job. even today I can't get a job that pays thirty to forty thousand dollars. Every now and then I test this by applying to a bunch of jobs with a properly professionally put together resume just to remind myself that the moment I take my off off the ball and let things slack, I lose everything. It's over.

It keeps me motivated to continue to be the best I can be in all of my endeavors and to never let things slack even when it's very tempting to.

A lot of people like you will never be accepted into the normal world. I'm one of them. Instead of trying to bang my fists and feet against the front door of the real world, I went off and made my own. I believe that you'll have the ability to do the same in due time!

It means a lot of time bumbling around, not having a fucking clue what you're doing with your life, where you live, what you'll eat, what tomorrow holds, dealing with the stress of there being no guarantee of a future, and the possibility that you're wasting all of your time for nothing. It's a hard thing to do. It all becomes worth it once something finally clicks.

I don't blame most people for not having the stomach to do this. The only reason I had the stomach for it is because I had no choice. I think that's what makes it easiest for people like me. It's Not the fact that I'm special, smart, or brave. It's that we have no choice. It's a superpower because it forces you to do the thing that you need to do to live an awesome life later.

The normal world sucks anyway; the best part of life is coming up with a plan to make your own. :)

9
 
 

Short Summary

  1. The speaker discusses a significant detail overlooked in a previous video about a legal case involving Disney and a patron's death from an allergic reaction.
  2. The case revolves around a forced arbitration clause in Disney's streaming service agreement, preventing the victim's family from suing Disney in court.
  3. The speaker argues that if the patron had pirated Disney's content instead of subscribing, they might have had legal recourse.
  4. This leads to a broader critique of corporate practices, highlighting instances where consumers are unfairly treated or misled after legitimate purchases.
  5. The speaker expresses frustration with the notion that consumers should read lengthy agreements to understand their rights, believing companies exploit these agreements to avoid accountability.
  6. They criticize companies like Adobe and Disney for taking away access to software and content that customers have paid for.
  7. The speaker argues that disabling activation servers or imposing restrictive DRM punishes legitimate customers while making piracy more appealing.
  8. They highlight a specific case where a customer was denied a refund for perpetually licensed software that no longer worked due to server shutdowns.
  9. The speaker criticizes the idea that paying for content absolves companies from responsibility and claims paying customers often receive worse treatment than those who pirate.
  10. They emphasize the importance of fair treatment for those who choose to pay for products, arguing that the current system incentivizes piracy by providing better access and ownership rights.
10
 
 

Summary

  1. Monopolistic tendencies: Reddit’s partnership with Google exemplifies how big tech companies work together to limit competition, ultimately harming users.
  2. Loss of niche communities: The transition from small forums to platforms like Reddit signifies a loss of personal interaction and community-driven knowledge.
  3. Financial barriers: The requirement for new search engines to pay for access to Reddit’s data creates significant financial hurdles that can stifle innovation.
  4. Diminished search quality: As content becomes gated, users are left with lower-quality search results dominated by SEO-driven sites.
  5. Reduced choice: The consolidation of internet resources leads to a lack of diversity in search options, limiting users’ abilities to find information.
  6. Exploiting user content: Reddit’s policies indicate a shift towards monetizing user-generated content for corporate gain rather than user benefit.
  7. Future implications: If these trends continue, the internet may become a less accessible and more controlled space, reminiscent of pre-internet information gatekeeping.

Short Summary

  1. [Louis] Rossman reflects on the decline of the internet from 20 to 25 years ago, which was characterized by vibrant, small communities and forums.
  2. He reminisces about platforms like DMmusic.com and the Womb forums, where he engaged with industry professionals and learned from influential figures in music and recording.
  3. Rossman laments the shift towards monopolistic platforms like Reddit and Facebook, which have replaced diverse online spaces.
  4. He criticizes the current state of the internet, expressing frustration with recent changes by Google and Reddit that limit access for alternative search engines.
  5. The speaker discusses the challenges of using alternative search engines to Google, highlighting the dominance of Google Maps and Places for local business searches.
  6. They point out a new barrier to entry where platforms like Reddit may charge fees for search engines to index their content, potentially limiting access to information online.
  7. Rossman emphasizes the need for an open internet, arguing that failures in business should not restrict information access for others.
  8. He reflects on the normalization of subscription models and the difficulties younger generations face in accessing digital content without fees.
  9. The speaker shares personal experiences regarding rising costs in their industry, making it harder for newcomers to enter the market.
  10. Rossman concludes by expressing optimism about returning to work despite recent health issues and emphasizes the importance of competition and access to resources in the industry.

Pinned by Louis Rossmann

@rudiger86 | 6 days ago (edited)

Why is your audio always out of sync to the video?

Reply:

Louis Rossmann | @rossmanngroup | 6 days ago (edited)

I'm a Linux user, nothing works the way it's supposed to. If it did, it wouldn't be any fun. Pipewire with wireplumber, stock settings. There is probably some one thousand page manpage I'm supposed to read in order to get synced audio. Fuck if i have the time for it though.

11
 
 

I don't see this story being shared on Lemmy and I don't know why. The Youtuber in this video has been shoved onto the front lines by a greedy company that can't own up to it's own failed product and instead wants to sue for defamation for a poor review.

Share, like, subscribe, donate if you can. The "AllOffroad 4x4 Adventures TV" channel could use a little love.

12
 
 

Summary:

  1. Unethical Business Practices: Thermaltake’s refusal to sell replacement parts exemplifies a trend of companies prioritizing profit over customer satisfaction. This behavior alienates loyal customers and tarnishes brand reputation.
  2. Comfort vs. Cost: Despite the high price tag of the chair, its lack of comfort and repairability makes it less appealing than alternatives. This raises questions about consumer choices and brand trust.
  3. E-commerce Responsibilities: The claim that they can’t process part sales is misleading. E-commerce systems can easily handle transactions for replacement parts, indicating a lack of willingness to support customers.
  4. Customer Service Failures: The dismissive attitude of Thermaltake’s customer service demonstrates a failure to engage with customer feedback, further alienating users.
  5. Empowerment Through Right to Repair: Advocating for the right to repair fosters a culture where consumers feel empowered to maintain and own their products, countering planned obsolescence.
  6. Moral Business Conduct: The host emphasizes ethical practices in business, contrasting his values with companies that prioritize profits over accountability.
  7. Competitor Advantages: Brands like Herman Miller provide not just quality but also customer support and parts availability, proving that ethical practices can be financially beneficial.
13
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/17699965

I use this channel to post repair videos from Rossmann Repair Group Inc

I also discuss random things of interest to me. This is, and always will be, my personal variety show.

I teach Macbook component level logic board repair from a common sense, everyman's perspective. I try to make it seem viable, and entertaining. I also go over business concepts & philosophy that will be important to running & maintaining a sustainable, profitable business.


Summary

  1. The speaker expresses frustration with YouTube's decisions, feeling that the platform does not focus on improving the experience for content creators that viewers want to see.
  2. They mention a specific content creator who provides responsible firearm use and ownership content, which they believe is valuable.
  3. The speaker criticizes YouTube's new firearm policy, which could potentially lead to the removal of a significant portion of creators' content.
  4. They argue that YouTube should support and promote responsible firearm content instead of unfairly targeting it.
  5. The speaker discusses the issue of media companies not effectively moderating their comment sections, contrasting their own lack of resources with the financial capabilities of larger companies like ABC and CBS.
  6. The speaker criticizes YouTube for focusing on certain issues like firearm ownership instead of addressing persistent problems like sex bots and scamming ads.
  7. They emphasize the importance of finding ways to navigate these issues in the current digital landscape.
  8. The speaker expresses frustration about being scammed by someone named Mr. Roberts, who was recommended for investment.
  9. They question the motives behind certain policies on a website and express annoyance at the lack of viewership despite spending time editing videos.
  10. The speaker also mentions a comparison between Google's Anti-Trust lawyers and lawyers who do not understand an API.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
 
 

Short Summary

  1. The speaker discusses receiving a Samsung Gear S3 watch as a gift but facing compatibility issues with newer Samsung phones released after 2014.
  2. Samsung has stopped supporting the Gear S3 with newer phones due to software quality concerns, causing frustration among users.
  3. To make the watch work with newer phones, users have to download older versions of applications from random APK websites and go through a complicated setup process.
  4. The speaker highlights the importance of personal experiences in driving awareness and advocacy, urging people to care about issues like the right to repair.
  5. Users are expressing dissatisfaction and questioning Samsung's decision to render their previously functional devices obsolete.
  6. The speaker concludes the video by saying that's it for today and hopes the viewers have learned something.
22
 
 

Summary

  1. The case in Singapore highlights the growing concern over the privacy implications of infotainment systems in cars. Law enforcement agencies tapping into these systems raises questions about potential misuse of personal data.
  2. The ruling in the US that allows automakers to collect and store text messages without consent is a concerning precedent. It shows that current privacy laws may not adequately protect individuals from data exploitation.
  3. The collection and sale of driving data by automakers in the US without consent is an invasion of privacy. It raises concerns about who has access to this data and how it could potentially be used.
  4. Strengthening consumer privacy laws is crucial to ensure that individuals have control over their personal data and are protected from its misuse. Stricter regulations are needed to prevent unauthorized access and use of private information.
  5. Balancing the need for law enforcement with individual privacy rights is a complex issue. It requires finding a middle ground that allows for effective crime prevention while respecting individuals’ privacy and ensuring data protection.
23
 
 

Summary

  1. Spotify’s decision to discontinue Car Thing without offering any alternative solutions or support raises questions about their commitment to customer satisfaction. Customers who invested in the device and paid $90 are left without a functioning product.
  2. Car Thing was marketed as a way to enhance the in-car music streaming experience, but Spotify’s decision to discontinue it shows a lack of understanding of their customers’ needs and preferences.
  3. Spotify’s suggestion to dispose of Car Thing as e-waste instead of offering open-source solutions or repurposing options further highlights their disregard for the environment and their customers’ investment.
  4. This decision may lead to a decline in customer trust and loyalty towards Spotify. The lack of transparency and support for Car Thing reflects poorly on the company’s reputation and may result in customer churn.
  5. Customers who are dissatisfied with Spotify’s handling of Car Thing discontinuation can take action by filing chargebacks on their service payments. This can impact Spotify’s ability to process credit card payments and send a strong message to the company.
  6. The video also highlights the nostalgia for older music formats and the appreciation for physical media, suggesting that streaming services like Spotify may not always provide the same quality and ownership experience.
  7. Returning Car Thing as e-waste to Spotify’s corporate headquarters, as suggested by the video, can serve as a symbolic act of protest against the company’s decision and their lack of support for their own product.
24
 
 

Summary

  1. Consumer electronics manufacturers like Apple and Samsung are creating fake repair programs to avoid passing right to repair legislation.
  2. Criticism of Apple's repair program for being a PR stunt and requiring access to customer data.
  3. Highlighting Samsung's self-repair program that sells parts as assemblies, making repair difficult and costly.
  4. Frustration expressed at the requirement to interrogate customers and collect personal data under these repair programs.
  5. Emphasis on the importance of consumer privacy and transparency in the repair process, mentioning the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.
  6. Criticism of companies trying to avoid warranties based on unrelated issues and collecting customer data for advertising purposes.
  7. Strong advice against supporting CTIA and attending their events, as they lobby against the rights of repair shop owners and consumers.
  8. Promotion of their nonprofit repair preservation group, Repair We, which provides detailed repair guides for free.
  9. Emphasizing the importance of advocating for the best interests of repair shop owners and consumers, contrasting their approach with that of CTIA prioritizing financial gain over the repair industry.
25
 
 

Summary

  1. The speaker discusses the issue of Cloud Home Smart Home Wi-Fi connected devices that require internet connection to function, raising concerns about privacy and security.
  2. Examples mentioned include a pricey baby monitor now requiring a subscription to use and a tankless water heater connecting to the internet for remote control, posing security risks like unauthorized access.
  3. The speaker emphasizes the unnecessary reliance on manufacturer servers for controlling household devices and the potential security vulnerabilities that come with it.
  4. They express frustration with the trend of connecting all home devices to the internet, arguing against the need for devices like water heaters and thermostats to be connected due to security risks and potential malicious actions.
  5. Recommendations include using open-source software like Home Assistant to control devices directly without relying on manufacturer servers.
  6. Emphasis is placed on pushing back against the culture of giving manufacturers control over hardware, software, and data.
  7. Warning against the potential risks of having all home devices connected to the internet, such as the possibility of someone sabotaging or manipulating them remotely.
  8. Highlighting the lack of awareness among people about security risks associated with vehicle systems, particularly General Motors vehicles, being used to collect and sell data to insurance companies.
  9. Stressing the importance of consumers being informed about such practices to push back against them and prevent them from becoming the norm.
  10. Additionally, the speaker showcases a watch received as a gift that charges itself through arm movement, expressing appreciation for the thoughtful gesture.
view more: next ›