this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
401 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

8566 readers
2056 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

And the "ratio" refers to looking at twitter engagement (e.g. retweets, likes, replies) relative to the tweet

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I should have been more specific in my question. What did Mamdani reply with?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

A link to contribute to his campaign, because if Andrew is truly in it to win it for the Democratic party then he would line up instead of running against Mamdani

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

To a "contribute" link, which, I assume, leads to somewhere where you can contribute to his campaign.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for that - I never really understood it. So is this an example of a good or bad ratio? (I don't eX-Twitter at all, this is the extent of my social media presence)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

The ratio just refers to how the original tweet has far less likes/quotes/retweets than the follow up reply. An example here would be having two lemmy comments, one as a reply, and the reply has significantly more upvotes. So the "ratio" of who has the most upvotes/likes/quotes etc shows what the overwhelming opinion is. In this specific case the original tweet has just over 4k likes while the response tweet has 133k