this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
326 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23457 readers
2788 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 54 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Fuck yeah! UNION STRONG!

Looking up the pay rates of these dock workers and they get paid less than I do as a Teamster.

All the bullshit I overhear says they are all millionaires lmao. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Pay for longshoremen is based on their years of experience. Under the ILA's former contract with USMX, which expired on Monday, starting pay for dockworkers was $20 per hour. That rose to $24.75 per hour after two years on the job and to $31.90 after three years, topping out at $39 for workers with at least six years of service.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-much-do-dock-workers-make-longshoreman-salary/

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is really interesting. I had always been told Longshoreman make $50 an hour average...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Maybe that's with overtime or something. ILA top out at $39/hour.

The contract they want would be $69/hour after three years. That's about $144,000/year.

I clearly should not have gone to college.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Or you should unionize and get what you are rightly due.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

No, I think it's better if most white-collar jobs make less than blue-collar jobs. Someone needs to line the pockets of the c-suite. That will make less people go to college and less people aspire to bullshit jobs that don't do anything. Like the world needs another app developer, full stack developer, or middle manager. I think we're all set with that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

That's definitely going to be the overall average once you include about 4 hours of overtime

[–] [email protected] 47 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well, that’s something. I resent having to vote for her to prevent him. But I’ll take what I can get. Support unions!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Really interesting to see all the experts on TV. Just look them up.. usually billionaire business owners. Very concerned with the impact on the small business and the average Americans... Uh-huh.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Listen man, I'm all for news about candidates backing things but can we please start putting in * comments indicating whether or not they actually followed through with any actual progress or at least describing the situation at hand.

We just went through a years worth of Biden pretending to care about Gaza, and 2 months of Harris also pretending to care about Gaza. And there are still people on here that are convinced the uncommitted movement is going to vote for her, or that she is actually going to change her policy, which is dangerous because its exactly the same situation that caused Hillary to lose in 2016.

People are out here mast posting about Harris backing decriminalization of weed, yet everyone older than 30 pointed out that democrats have been promising to properly achieve that for 2 decades now, and that Harris refuses to mention her antics as state prosecutor.

I don't want to discount the positive here, especially because Trump would probably make a union assassination board lol, but we need to remember what actually transpires vs what a candidate claims.

spoilerIt only took 5 seconds for people to mention how Biden struck down the railroad union and their strike, and he stated that he doesn't want to negotiate with collective bargaining. Harris is his VP, and therefore she extends his policy. This could easily backfire, and we could just have a repeat situation where nothing happens for several weeks, and then all of a sudden a random backroom deal materializes out of nowhere, and nothing actually gets accomplished aside from PR.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Oh yay. She’s not snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, that’s better than I expect from democrats

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Salon - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Salon:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.salon.com/2024/10/02/harris-backs-striking-dockworkers-everything-on-the-biden-administration/?in_brief=true
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support