this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
752 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

25095 readers
1164 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you write commit messages like this, at least have the decency of squashing them when merging. Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

A PR for every tiny commit. You got it.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Pleasure by William Wallace

What is this life if, full of care,
We have no time to stand and stare.

No time to stand beneath the boughs
And stare as long as she allows.

No time to see, when woods we pass,
Where squirrels hide deez nuts in grass.

No time to see, in broad daylight,
Streams full of stars, get high at night.

No time to turn at Beauty's glance,
And watch her gangly feet like once.

No time to wait till her mouth can
Fit round that wide hog, whatup fam.

A poor life this if, full of care,
We have no time to stand and stare.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Shakespeare may have coined a lot of English words, but only Wallace can claim deez nuts.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

cannot believe William Wallace gotem through time

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

he was fighting the english with his dope rhymes before he ever held the sword

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Really neat, but man, wasn't intending to get teary eyed in the meme community 🥹

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Yeah me either, so I fixed it

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

git commit -m "A spirit trapped within a tree, no mouth to scream or eyes to see. A cage of bark, a prison of wood. A thing of rage where nature stood."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

git commit -m "$(fortune | cowsay)"

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

At the very least, please state which section you made small changes to, even if you are sure it's not worth mentioning what or why.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"Small changes to everything"
98 files changed, 7568 insertions(+), 1022 deletions(-)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

"Small changes to a few sections." There. Happy?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

git commit -m "Boss makes a dollar, I make a dime so I comment meaningful on company time"

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

thank god now we've AI to do this

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

this is literally the only thing I think is acceptable for AI to do for developers.

nobody reads commit history anyway and they always go straight to blame to find out who to kick the fuck out of.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And the blame has those commit messages. That is beside the fact that most authors may not even work there anymore

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I don't even waste my time anymore frankly. people just do a git add . and git commit -m "did some stuff".

sorry, I've just worked with a lot of shitbag devs that honestly think of git as a flat filesystem that can't even properly branch or merge.

personally, I still put in clear commits and even do patch level adds. from what I have experienced though, using AI to generate those commit messages based on actual changes would be a godsend compared to the fuckery I've had to deal with.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Always put a ticket number in the commit message. That can make it much easier later to find out what the context was for some weird solution.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Curate your commits, friends. They should be structured for the benefit of the reviewer. This can be accomplished with liberal use of interactive rebasing.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

It's fine, the reviewer doesn't have time to actually look at the code anyway. Lgtm, ship it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My best work happens between typing out random stuff and pulling my hair out in the squash and reordering

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When in doubt, soft reset everything and commit from the ground up.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

That's also a good option

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I keep putting that off, but maybe I should really dive into that.
Thanks for telling me about the TUI btw, I didn't know we had that too now!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago

At a former workplace I created a leaderboard or most swears in commit messages lol

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

“Sometimes the best way to fix a bug is to introduce an unstable new feature that will later have many bug reports. But the code will now work. And was only written after email chain that har management involved.”

“This is a temporary fix only, and the feature flag it’s under should be turned off after pull request 203. Under no circumstances should bug reports 1923 and 2045 use this new feature to fix issues, even if hours of work can be saved using this ”

“I am blameless for any future issues caused by using this new feature. Here be dragons.”

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

“this is temporary test code that should be removed before delivery to the customer”

this is real

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You should put this at the code, or at the flag documentation. The one place you it can't go at all is in a commit message.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Have better docs in those places; but for a class A mess, like above, make sure the approvers see this front and center. Make them sign for it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Nope. That's a temporary solution™.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

git commit -m 'a meaningful message'

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

This is where I thought it was going as well.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Love it.

While folks are thinking about git commit messages I will offer this.

https://cbea.ms/git-commit/

My only criticism of the essay is that the most important bit is listed at number 7.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've worked with a few people who are just incomprehensible. One refuses to write commit messages of any detail. Just "work in progress". Cast him into the pit.

There was another guy that refused to name his tests. His code was like

describe(''. () => {
  it('', () => {
     expect(someFunc()).toEqual(0);
  }
 it('', () => {
    expect(someFunc(1)).toEqual(0);
  }
 it('', () => {
   expect(someFunc("").toEqual(1);
 }
}

He was like, "Test names are like comments and they turn into lies! So I'm not going to do it."

I was like, a. what the fuck. b. do you also not name your files? projects? children?

He was working at a very big company last I heard.

edit: If you're unfamiliar, the convention is to put a human readable description where those empty strings are. This is used in the test output. If one fails, it'll typically tell include the name in the output.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

For complex changes go with "self-explanatory" just to fuck with peoples' confidence

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

I once found a commit message in our commit history that just said, "i hate git..." bcz they hadn't changed anything, and I think it took a new line character and decided that they'd actually changed like 5 lines of code twhen they hadn't.

It was the funniest shit, someone who was a senior lead for like 9 years that had left, and 5 years later I find that...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

git commit -m "here is everything in this commit $(tar -czv . | base64)"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Go for broke
git commit -m "It works on my machine $(tar -ca . -C / | base64)"