Me to AI: alright, I'm about to send you a two part message. Do not respond to the first message.
AI: Gotcha! I won't respond
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
254 points (100.0% liked)
memes
16286 readers
3980 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- [email protected] : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- [email protected] : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- [email protected] : Linux themed memes
- [email protected] : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That could reasonably be interpreted as you haven't sent the first part yet.
But I assume it still responds like that when you do.
Who in their right mind would want to talk to AI begin with? I don’t think I’ll ever understand why someone would want to do this outside of a single instance of curiosity.
Perhaps someone with multiple instances of curiosity?
A forest just disappeared because of you
I wanted to stay on top of the food chain but not like this.
My goal was to eat one of everything nontoxic.
A species just went extinct.
Please let it be my species.
Wait I'm still here.
Shit.
Yeah doing this is just a self own
As someone who grew up using telephones... the last part is the most human chat bot interaction I've ever seen.
"You hang up first!"
"No, you hang up first!"
I would think that, since it's been recognised that these messages are costing a lot of energy (== money) to process, companies would at some point add a simple <if input == "thanks"> type filter to catch a solid portion of them. Why haven't they?
It won't be as simple as that and the engineers who work on these systems can only think in terms of LLM and text classification, so they'd run your message through a classifier and end the conversation if it returns a "goodbye or thanks" score above 0.8, saving exactly 0 compute power.
I mean, even if we resort to using a neural network for checking "is the conversation finished?" That hyper-specialised NN would likely be orders of magnitude cheaper to run than your standard LLM, so you could likely save quite a bit of power/money by using it to filter for the actual LLM, no?
Because the only progress we know how to make on computers is backwards it seems.
Generative AI is supposed to be destructive. It's a feature.
I dont understand. People argued a book with me here for using AI quoting usage of large amounts of water and noise around the data server areas. But upvoted this? And how is this a meme? Its a long screenshot.
Mmm... I can smell the smog from here
"If you say goodbye again, I'm going to say it back! No, you hang up!"
People on lemmy bitching about how bad AI is for the environment, yet this gets upvotes.
Doublethink 10/10
Hey it’s Mister Gotcha here to derail debate with the weight of his own ego.
Wouldn't that be the gpt user that posted this screenshot? Someone making some kind of "I'm getting back at those pesky AI companies by costing them money" ... by pressing the "push to run a machine that burns the planet' button?
Or worse yet, it's an accelerationist willingly pushing the button.
Oh, lighten up.