IsaamoonKHGDT_6143

Most of the time technology does not cause a radical change in society except in some cases.

The system eventually adapts to new technology only if that technology can be replicated by anyone, and other problems suddenly appear that the system can't solve at the same time. It's just another dark age for humanity, and then it recovers and moves on.

But that is already the fault of the person who gave those instructions to the AI.

Denmark has the best labor laws in the world.

"When you are in a decision that puts you in danger you accept the tool that you initially rejected."

It seems that Japan has applied this

People want to enjoy the Benicios, but not face the consequences. I think people should have financial education so as not to depend on the government and I understand Denmark's decision, because if a solution is not applied, they could be ruined by pensions.

Coming soon: Recall comes to Linux

Why doesn't Mozilla change or add the MIT license to Pocket?

AlphaFold 3 which can help in the prediction of some proteins. Although it has some limitations, it cannot be used in all cases, only in what it can perform without any problem.

I wish there was an alternate history forum or novel that explores this scenario.

Exactly, the environment changes and we must adapt to face the new changes.

The problem is that misinformation from both Pro-AI and Anti-AI groups makes it harder to obtain solid data.

Each winter marks the beginning and end of a generation of AI. We are now seeing more progress and as long as there is no technical limit it seems that its progress will not be interrupted.

But the poor performance is due to TypeScript and later this year they will release a Go compiler that will make it 10 times faster.