the_doktor

I'd love to see a bike trying to ride down a busy fucking road and not get its ass ran over. Maybe your little suburban hillbilly elitist streets have people pedaling down at a scant fraction of the speed of real cars, but that shit doesn't fly anywhere else.

You seem to think having mobility issues is an all or nothing, can't-move-at-all or you can run around at will thing. I swear to fuck, people like you are the goddamn problem.

Grow up and figure out the reality of the world. Then get back to me. I am not going to live somewhere where I have to walk a path, pull myself onto a bus with tons of other people, cram myself into a seat, ride where I need to go, get what I need, CARRY THOSE THINGS BACK DOWN TO THE BUS AND GET ON THE BUS WITH THOSE THINGS, AND THEN GET OFF AND WALK BACK HOME ALSO WITH THOSE THINGS. Hell, even if I was healthy, that's a pain in the ass.

Do you not understand such fucking simple things? Maybe you need to take the time to think about them. Don't reply to me for a couple of days. Look at people who have mobility issues that don't look that bad. See people getting out of their cars in the mobility parking that just snap up right out of their cars and walk seemingly without issue to the place they're going? Hint: most people who do that are not faking a disability. Disability can manifest itself in many ways, and it doesn't take much beyond simply walking down the street or living alone and being able to do enough basic tasks to get by safely to run into their actual problems.

Grow up, shut up, think, and get back to me. If this was any other goddamn condition, you'd be ostracized from society for being so goddamn hateful, but for some reason, ableism isn't a real enough thing to people for them to be angry, and it absolutely should be as someone who does have some serious mobility issues.

How the fuck do you think I think Unix is one system? What the living fuck is wrong with you, child? I have been around since AT&T UNIX was a fucking thing, you baby. Infant. Child. Poor little fucking hateful, spiteful, baby who can't stand using something that is popular and has to cling to something that he thinks earns him some sort of fake nerd cred. Grow the goddamn up.

When you speak of something in general terms, like "UNIX", you're not implying it's one thing. This is how language works. Which you would have learned if you actually got to high school and passed your fucking English classes.

You're just a troll and not worth anyone's time, and you're trying to make me into a troll when all I'm doing is telling you the actual history and truth behind operating systems.

Here's what you do: you re-read everything I've said, and you don't reply. You take some fucking time to think things over and analyze your life and your pathetic infatuations with things that aren't "popular" because you feel inferior attaching yourself to something everyone else is doing. Several days.

Then you come back and you apologize. I will be happy to accept it.

Otherwise, just shut the fuck up if you're not willing to do that. I don't want to hear it.

Oh good, now the angry, immature contrarian is accusing me of being a bot.

You also accusr me of misunderstanding badic shit like how BSD came from UNIX when I never said differently. If you had any reading comprehension, you'd see I said UNIX was still being used at that time OVER *BSD.

Similar fallacies and bullshit litter the rest of your immature little shit rant.

I can guarantee I wrote every word of what I say and despise the rise of GenAI and would never use it.

Can you say the same?

Yes, the idea of having roads on other roads that already exist that were created back when the horse and buggy was a thing is the main goddamn problem.

No, the road is meant for high-speed cars. Get your slow, fragile bikes off of them.

YOU HAVE TO FUCKING WALK TO AND FROM THE BUS, THE TRAM, THE SUBWAY, AND THE TRAIN. THOSE ARE NOT POOR MOBILITY FRIENDLY OPTIONS.

HOW FUCKING HARD IS THIS FOR YOU TO FUCKING UNDERSTAND, YOU HATEFUL SHIT?

Holy fuck, I swear. This is exactly why I tell people that if they think Linux people are delusional, they know absolutely nothing about delusional because they've never seen a fucking *BSD luser try to argue his way out of a wet paper bag and fail.

So the idea that the overwhelming majority of every single place/person/entity that wants a free UNIX-like OS with a choice choosing Linux over *BSD is somehow not valid? Sure, buddy. *BSD had its time to rise up and win over Linux and it did not. It failed because of the reasons I said. It has zero advantages over Linux and so many disadvantages.

Of course, *BSD came first, but even back then, *BSD wasn't the primary system, UNIX and other systems like MINIX and the ones you mentioned were so much more popular than *BSD ever was. But when Linux arrived, *BSD began to die out. *BSD was a poor afterthought, even before Linux. There's a good reason the "*BSD is dying" meme appeared very early in internet culture even back when Slashdot was a huge thing, because it was absolutely based on the reality of the world.

Don't make me laugh about *BSD's "design decisions", ones that basically create a system that is much more difficult to work with because it has a much more simplistic base than the much more robust Linux ecosystem. The idea of separation of base system and packages has nothing to do with efficiency and more to do with a simple design option, something Linux can also do with atomic distributions, which while not quite equal to what *BSD does but has the same idea of separation of base OS and packages, have their certain advantages but aren't flexible enough to do more advanced, low-end system work, which gives Linux an advantage by far.

ESR's Cathedral and the Bazaar arguments have been repeatedly argued against as a good model for Free software development for a very long time, and Linux wins because of more flexible development done by more people but with a very strong and centralized point of vetting said code for most Linux software, which means it's not just "thousands of monkey developers" randomly throwing code at Linux. Your use of ESR as an argument against Linux shows how out of time you are with understanding Free software and how it all works to come together to create a great system.

No one wants to use non-free hardware support, troll.

If Google, Microsoft, Apple, or Meta were caught using GPL against its license, they'd be sued to oblivion and they know it. That's why they don't. If you think GPL is unenforceable, you are a fool. Meanwhile, ALL of those companies are, in fact, using the hell out of *BSD licensed code and you fucking know it. Your garbage development model helps those garbage companies exist.

Your argument is obsolete, and the clowns are all in the *BSD tent.

You are an angry little contarian who hates popular, mainstream things and you are trying to justify it with bullshit. Grow up.

No, you want a world without cars. That is your stated goal. You backtracking is you trying to take a more neutral position than your original one, which is "cars bad, everyone walk/use public transportation". That's ableist, hateful, and impractical for a ton of people, including people who don't have mobility issues for so many damn reasons, including transporting goods, weather, going places as a family, having a shelter for not only the weather but for anything else, and going directly to and from one's destination. Cars are the primary way of transport and nothing you and your anti-car buddies say are going to change it. You're like vegans and religious people arguing against common sense and logic and reason; you are contrarian for the sake of being contrarian.

Wake up and accept modern life and our necessities.

Fuck "fuck cars". There's your "unproductive language", which is, you know, just language. Being vulgar isn't unproductive, it has its reasons to exist. Which, in this case, to in no certain terms damn your entire worldview.

You mean the entire fucking world where *BSD is basically dead and Linux is fucking everywhere? Yeah... sure, buddy.

*BSD has always been a poor alternative to Linux because of design decisions, poor hardware support, and a garbage license that allows non-free software to "steal" (take) and use your code irresponsibly. *BSD sucks.

Someone is just jealous of Linux's success but is so caught up being a contrarian shitlord that they can't admit the truth.

Because there aren't 100000000000000 other, much better games to play out there. Nope. Tarkov is the only game ever created that is any good. So good that people are willing to allow rootkit anti-cheat garbageware to be installed on their system to play this holy, godly, superhyper great game.

How do you have an easier time with a cane walking around everywhere than riding in a fucking car? I think you're lying.

Why do you love dystopian societies where people aren't able to get around freely unless they are privileged?