this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
304 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

67825 readers
4952 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (7 children)

This is a real problem, and Apple can’t patch it out of the hardware. The only thing they can do is write software to run in advance of hardware execution to “randomize” when and where memory is written to and read from. That will slightly decrease the performance of these chips. The “older” chips from 2021 would see the worst performance reduction. M3 users probably won’t even be able to tell.

The attack vector is a web browser. Even a completely updated safari is vulnerable, but Chrome is seemingly easier to exploit (the way browsers store website data in memory is the key). An encrypted browser won’t change anything because the attack is reading the unencrypted data being displayed to the user.

It takes several minutes for a compromised website to perform the attack. So basic sense practices apply. If you think a website is unsafe, don’t open it. If you think something is happening, closing the suspicious sites immediately might stop the attack before any damage is done. I don’t know how easy it would be to compromise a trusted site, but it’s been done in the past.

Apple could potentially patch Safari to do things that make it harder for the attack to work correctly, and you can bet they’re already retooling the next generation of processors to get rid of this exploit. They did the same thing when an unpatchable exploit was found in the M1 series, M2s have a stopgap measure, and M3s were redrawn to make it an nonissue.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (6 children)

If you think a website is unsafe, don’t open it.

Ahh yes, back to the dark ages of the internet where just clicking the wrong link can completely compromise your system.

Thanks crapple and its useful idiots.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean, Intel did it first and I do believe AMD and Qualcomm also followed suit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes, and Apple decided to do the same thing knowing the risks.

"Intel did it!" is not a panacea for apple; it makes things worse for them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You can't compete without doing it. Do you think Intel and AMD stopped doing it? Hell nah, people will find new exploits in a few years, I'm certain.

If you don't do speculative execution, you'll be left in the dust unfortunately.

If anything, this shows that there should be separate lines of CPUs for handling classified data and such, that don't do it. But it would likely be prohibitively expensive to implement a separate product line.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)