this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
129 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

5007 readers
2 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (5 children)

From the article ...

Although many ad-blockers have migrated to Manifest V3 versions, these are generally less capable of detecting and blocking promoted targeted content.

Although Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, and Apple Safari have all adopted MV3, they have done so with their own implementation modifications, allowing users greater freedom while still benefiting from the security enhancements.

Still, support for MV2 is the only way to go for older add-ons, and Firefox reiterated via an announcement today that it will continue to support it in the foreseeable future.

"While some browsers are phasing out Manifest V2 entirely, Firefox is keeping it alongside Manifest V3," said Mozilla.

Glad to hear Firefox is doing the dual-support thing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Firefox made a big mistake of breaking ad-on compatibility in the past. Let’s not make that mistake again.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you're talking about the protocol that allowed things like flash, that was the right decision and the web is much better off without it. It was a security nightmare and no functionality was lost in the long run.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

No, I’m talking about a whole add-on ecosystem that they killed back then. Flash was always garbage. But, I remember lots of plug-ins like FasterFox just stopped working and some developers felt that porting to the newer API wasn’t worth it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)