this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
8 points (100.0% liked)
Meshtastic
703 readers
1 users here now
A community to discuss Meshtastic (https://meshtastic.org/docs/introduction)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've been using the Meshtastic site planner (https://site.meshtastic.org/) to plan out my mesh before committing to anything. Among other variables, you can plug in the antenna gains/heights to get a good idea of what your coverage will be (though it is just an estimate). A 6 dBi antenna and a few meters of height can go a long way from the results I've been seeing. The biggest factor is line of sight, so getting your gateway node up as high above the "smaller" nodes will give the best results regardless of which antenna you go with.
I think "gateway" is the more correct term. From what I've read in the docs, "router" is usually used for nodes configured with the "router" role (which is different from a node connected to the internet via MQTT). In most cases, it's recommended to just keep all the nodes in "client" role since the "router" role behavior can be counter-productive in many cases.
I would be careful about using high gain antennas over 3dbi because while the signal can transmit physically farther, it also is a narrower window of signal and can be blocked by elevation changes. As an example, somebody with a 3DBI antenna would be able to talk to somebody on an airplane, but somebody with a 10DBI antenna would not.
I'll second this. My 6 dBi antenna was able to hit a plane, but only because it was also 50 miles away. The cone on a 10 dBi would be too narrow even for that.