this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)

movies

3150 readers
563 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

πŸ”Ž Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

meh. so niche, why would anyone not into f1 care about this movie

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Idk if you're seriously asking, but, as someone who doesn't even have a casual interest in motorsports, I'll answer:

  1. I like Brad Pitt
  2. I like the archetypical structure of sports movies
  3. The director did the new Top Gun, and I thought that the plane action in that was well-done, so I imagine the driving portions here will be equally thrilling.

Like, yeah it's a niche sport, but look at Moneyball, another highly specific sports movie starring Brad Pitt. Hell, that movie is as much about statistics and sports finance as it is about baseball, and I still think it's the best "sports" movie of the past 25 years. And I have even LESS interest in baseball than I do Formula 1.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

this is fair, good points. for me brad isnt enough to pull me in, and i hate these types of sports movies. the trailer just seemed so... silly.

top gun 2 was mediocre. it just didnt have the character draw from the first one (maybe its just nostalgia). im glad i saw it, but it has the rewatchability of schindlers list.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I don't disagree about Top Gun 2 in the holistic, "how was the movie?" sense. Well maybe not about it being as rewatchable as Schindler's List, that's a touch hyperbolic. However, as I said, I thought the cinematography, editing, VFX, and sound design of the flight sequences was suitably thrilling, even if the narrative elements were "whatever" at best.

From what they showed of the race sequences, it seems like they are employing a similar ethos, and I'm hopeful that, without the appeal to nostalgia that permeated the entirety of Top Gun 2, they might put a little more effort into the narrative surrounding the action set pieces. Granted, that's unlikely, but it's not really a deal breaker for me, cause the boilerplate underdog sports story still slaps for me if it's done competently. Sort of like how so many crime thrillers wind up treading similar rags to riches to ruin plots, but folks keep making them.

I can understand your trepidation though. I admit I'm granting it a lot of grace, simply because I expect it to be a 6/10 movie, with 9/10 action set pieces. As Calvin and Hobbes taught me back in the day, if you keep your expectations low, they are that much easier to exceed.

load more comments (1 replies)