this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
734 points (100.0% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
6630 readers
187 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/[email protected] - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/[email protected] - General memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Assuming a liberal definition of fish (I doubt this guy cares about scientific classifications), that would be a blue whale
Just like to point out, there is no scientific definition of fish. It doesn't make sense from a evolutionary perspective (many types of fish are evolved from land animals and vice versa).
However if you categorize it as animals that with gills, you lose a bunch of animals typically considered fish like several species of amphibious fish, while including many animals not typically considered fish, like several frogs. Then there is of course lungfish with both lungs and gills, and fish with other breathing organs entirely.
Many biologist therefore argue that even whales should be considered fish despite being mammals, i don't remember the exact reasoning though, but i think it's related to evolution and the clade(s) they belong to.
Sorry for pulling the "um ashtuly" card, just a big autistic nerd.
So, which one has large mouth and no teeth?