this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
143 points (100.0% liked)

Games

18763 readers
152 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 97 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (52 children)

Considering that the AI craze is what's fueling the shortage and massive increase in GPU prices, I really don't see gamers ever embracing AI.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Speak for yourself. As an avid gamer I am excitedly looking towards the future of AI in games. Good models (with context buffers much longer than the .9s in this demo) have the potential to revolutionise the gaming industry.

I really don't understand the amount of LLM/AI hate in Lemmy. It is a tool with many potential uses.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's a difference between LLMs making games and LLMs trained to play characters in a game.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not opposed to either. I think of this a bit like procedural generation, except better.

load more comments (49 replies)