this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

2143 readers
119 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

This is a curious but not a very effective way to test. It's subject to several biases and the possibility that you happen to notice an ad related to your test topic that you wouldn't otherwise have noted. It's similar to how fortune tellers find ways to connect common patterns to an individual and make comments all seem like they could apply to you, but with ads and a topic.

With modern phone OSs, the concerning behavior also very challenging to technically achieve. Microphone enforcement is handled by the OS, so at the very least you'd probably need collusion, and that's not including the impact on battery life having the phone application processor on all the time.

[โ€“] Taiatari 10 points 3 weeks ago

I think it is called the Barnum effect, when a person thinks very broad things are specifically related to them

load more comments (2 replies)