Linguistics

853 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to the community about the science of human Language!

Everyone is welcome here: from laypeople to professionals, Historical linguists to discourse analysts, structuralists to generativists.

Rules:

Instance rules apply.
Be reasonable, constructive, and conductive to discussion.
Stay on-topic, specially for more divisive subjects. And avoid unnecessary mentioning topics and individuals prone to derail the discussion.
Post sources when reasonable to do so. And when sharing links to paywalled content, provide either a short summary of the content or a freely accessible archive link.
Avoid crack theories and pseudoscientific claims.
Have fun!

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Language Log » Are all writing systems equally easy / hard? (languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The most fascinating thing about the Tangut script is that it was created by a single individual. One man sat down and thought "this is gonna be great!". What an absolute madman.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Similarly, Cherokee syllabary and Hangul for Korean. The former was even created by someone who was himself illiterate!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

The former was even created by someone who was himself illiterate!

People often highlight the genius of Sequoyah behind the syllabary, but rarely talk about how much hard labour it involved. This sort of "one symbol per word is too much, I'll need to represent word fragments" insight is not something that comes up naturally, it's clearly the result of trial and error.