this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
1314 points (100.0% liked)

World News

46315 readers
3047 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apparently, Ukrainian drones pushed through and started a chain reaction.

Explosions reportedly continued for hours, and authorities evacuated nearby settlements. Initial reports indicate that the site, previously protected by one of Russia’s densest air defense networks, suffered catastrophic damage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago (26 children)

I hace no idea how serious a blow this is. Can anyone provide any sense of magnitude for these 264 000 tons of munitions? Like how big a chunk of total ammunition stockpile woukd this be? How big is it compared to current manufacturing rate?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

Chatgpt thoughts.. With some spot checking on the math seems right.. Here’s the context of 250,000 tonnes of munitions from the Russian side:

Russia fires 10,000 to 60,000 artillery shells per day, depending on the front.

A typical 152mm shell weighs around 40–43 kg.

That means Russia can burn through 1,800+ tonnes per day in peak operations.

Russian production in 2023 was estimated at 2 million+ shells per year.

Russia also draws from Soviet-era stockpiles and imports from North Korea and Iran.

Russian doctrine favors volume over precision. Their artillery-centric strategy relies on overwhelming force rather than accuracy.

250,000 tonnes equates to roughly 6 million shells.

For Russia, that’s only about 3–5 months of usage at current intensity.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Love how this is downvoted only for another thread to come to pretty much the same conclusion lol

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

In an attempt to be more moderate: i think it is impolite to regurgitate the words of an LLM in a forum where we are expecting the dialogue to be between humans.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's fair, just realize some of us are tired of online pessimism to such a degree that an AI - telling me there are in fact potential solutions and to keep trying - is actually good for our mental health. I only use Perplexity for research and musings that I sometimes post here to be discussed, not to completely replace human interaction on the Fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

They literally only used it to help attempt to calculate the value, said they used AI to do so. There's no excuse besides people see Ai and hate.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why do I trust a LLM more than humans? Because the LLM answers me instantly what I want to know. The human changes the subject and then after 10 interactions, they just ghost you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is trust the right word there? Maybe interact with, value, or use?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People are highly biased. Le chat mistral gives me the whole story.

If I ask a marxist and a libertarian the same question, I get two completely different answers.

I cannot trust people, such a small selection of data.

I use LLM to give me a summary of all of the data and all of the opinions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You think you do, but you don't. The LLM will give you the answer you want. It most definitely does not give you all of the data and all of the opinions. It does indoctrinate you to be less critical and more lazy when it comes to fact finding though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It answers you instantly, but you have no way of knowing the veracity of that answer. It will answer you instantly even if there is no answer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Blow up 2 more and be done with it

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)