Linux
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
view the rest of the comments
Hey everyone, I would love some guidance here.
I'm new to Linux, I'm using Arch Linux and pacman currently. Would it be better to get more acquainted with flatpacks? If I wanted to swap to flatpacks would I just start using it? Would I need to transfer currently installed applications from pacman to flatpack?
Would it be wiser to move to Nix? I love the concept of atomic updates, that's the main functionality I'm interested in getting - I like my system cutting edge but stable. But I'm fully uneducated on how applications get used by the common man. Like in Windows if I find a small application like Hex Kit I find its .exe and install it. In Linux I download their version online and I get .bin's and .pak's and .so and .dat and I have no idea how to get the bastard working. Same with like a Godot export to Linux, I get a .so or a .pck.
Any advise or educational sources are much appreciated. I'm learning as fast as I can but I'm drinking from a firehouse right now lol. I'm also building a doc to help my friends jump over so if I'd be better served using something other than pacman I want to know so I can update the doc before handing it to them.
I am not sure if Arch or Nix are good distros if you are new to Linux.
I would say Linux Mint might be a better option to get your bearings. This is a subjective thing, but I personally found it helpful to slowly learn some core things about Linux (CLI, base system architecture, DE's and their nuances) in a controlled environment.
Just sharing my thoughts. It's cool if Arch or Nix works better for you.
I'd probably agree in general but I'm a software engineer and my friends that would be moving over are software engineers and so I'm less worried. I wanted to take this opportunity to learn more about OS'es and get more familiarized with each part of the process and Arch has made that super easy as it obfuscated so little. I still used some cheat scripts to get up and running like arch_install I think but it's been generally nice.
I am on the Konsole Debugging random issues far more than I'd like but right now it's a hobby I'm partially choosing to spend time on - I think things would function just fine if I ignored them for a bit. Still, all things to consider and improve on - which is why I'm asking about package managers.
That's fair. My frame of context was more general.😀