this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
1121 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

16700 readers
2179 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (39 children)

I regularly work with Americans, Canadians, and Europeans. So many times each group defaults to their own format and mistakes occur I gave up on all the formats listed by OP. If i have to write a date in correspondence its like: Feb 27th 2013. No ambiguity. No one has ever challenged me on it either. It is universally understood.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (29 children)

You meant 27th Feb 2013, right? It is utterly moronic to have day in the middle irrespectively if you start with or finish on the year.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

You meant 27th Feb 2013, right?

Does it matter anymore with this format? You figured out the exact day, month, and year irrespective of the order.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's not about understanding. It's about sorting,

Everybody understand both notations, but if you use it for filenames sorting is important. Natural sorting order is an important feature that should be considered.

day month year is just stupid in that regard. Not only does the of the month depend on the language, but also if sorted you get the first of every month grouped together.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

"Moronic" before and now "stupid". Folks are very passionate about their date formats.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If you're listing dates, then using a sortable format is ideal. But if you're just referencing one in the middle of a correspondence, it's best to use whatever format the recipient is most familiar with. No one is sorting emails by a date given in the third paragraph

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)