this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
141 points (100.0% liked)

science

18743 readers
189 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Although the theory is promising, the duo point out that they have not yet completed its proof. The theory uses a technical procedure known as renormalization, a mathematical way of dealing with infinities that show up in the calculations.

So far Partanen and Tulkki have shown that this works up to a certain point—for so-called 'first order' terms—but they need to make sure the infinities can be eliminated throughout the entire calculation.

"If renormalization doesn't work for higher order terms, you'll get infinite results. So it's vital to show that this renormalization continues to work," explains Tulkki. "We still have to make a complete proof, but we believe it's very likely we'll succeed."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (19 children)

Although the theory is promising, the duo point out that they have not yet completed its proof

Physics is not math, you can't "prove" a physical theory. You make predictions and through experiment or observation Nature has the last word.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Quick, get in contact with the physicists, they need the insight that you got from thinking about a sentence in a pop sci article for 30 seconds.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

If you get ahold of them, I need to tell them why they're wrong because of this one time I watched star trek while I was baked.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)