Games

38145 readers

1019 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

Submissions have to be related to games
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
No excessive self-promotion
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Microsoft addresses the huge Xbox leaks: here’s Phil Spencer’s full memo (www.theverge.com)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The leaks revealed plans for a revised Xbox Series X.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] -4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Why do people behave as if Starfield was the first game not released on PlayStation?

Who is doing that? It's just blatantly obvious that it would've been released on PlayStation without Microsoft meddling and their games sell a shitload, I mean Skyrim has been chugging along over a decade now. So I'm not really sure how Starfield is irrelevant to Ms buying shit conversation.

It's not what being an exclusive means (let not get into linguistics here, I mean strictly the gaming industry term). I agree this specific case was anticompetitive but framing it as an exclusive just weakens this point in my opinion and allows to shift the debate away from it.

Away from what? Everyone knows what it means -- or maybe I don't, please enlighten me in that case.

load more comments (1 replies)