this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
-6 points (35.0% liked)

Videos

15694 readers
232 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to [email protected] instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both [email protected] and [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Lower oil prices in the US mean more damage to the biosphere, the world, and ultimately the US and even Venezuela. This view is as myopic as the one it seeks to criticize.

The real solution is to phase out oil production and use as rapidly as practicable. Doing this will solve many huge problems, but also have the added benefit of rendering this entire conflict moot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In my opinion:

The oligarchy in the world and the US esp. will not let that happen, if we keep voting for the status quo.

This will just screw the working class since we are all reliant on them for transportation.

The same in other countries, only the people with money are okay with this, they will keep burning coal and gas.

Massive investments in public transportation and nuclear power would be required.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I think a lot of their power is that people don’t think change is possible, or are too distracted with day to day concerns. But I think it can happen if people demand it forcefully enough.