this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
84 points (100.0% liked)

CanadaPolitics

2696 readers
93 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

"underused 407". Well, how do you fix that when it's privately run and the most expensive rolled highway in the world. Lol

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Which was sold to a foreign entity by the same government saying it's underused.

The conservative party is such a drain on prosperity for all... and now the leopards are eating the faces of the rurals that voted for them. And they won't learn.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

and now the leopards are eating the faces of the rurals that voted for them.

Prior to 1995, the (southern) rural areas almost never voted Conservative, typically favouring the Liberals and sometimes the NDP (northern rural Ontario has maintained strong NDP support all along). To add, the NDP was born out of the former United Farmers party, so there was once a close association between them. The rural areas have been traditionally very left leaning.

The question is: What changed? It is unlikely that the people magically changed from one year to the next. Perhaps the Liberals and NDP figured rural areas were dying and thus not worth worrying about?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

the former United Farmers party

Well I don't know what happened really, but at a guess maybe it had something to do with all the farmers who sold out to either the big "agribusiness" operators that have largely replaced them or to housing developers. Concentration of ownership has been a problem in many industries, but rarely have the effects been so dramatic as in farming. Since the heyday of the United Farmers of Canada there are 75% fewer farms in Canada, and 233% more Canadians. Living in a "rural" area no longer means you're all that likely to own a farm,

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Since the heyday of the United Farmers of Canada there are 75% fewer farms in Canada

While true, Ontario farms declined only by 1% from 1990 – when these rural areas by and large voted NDP – and 1995 – when they changed their ways. The declines were more like 10-15% every five years prior to that, as well as for a time after that, so this change happened during an anomalous period when there was effectively no decline in farms.

Living in a “rural” area no longer means you’re all that likely to own a farm

Essentially nobody in rural Northern Ontario owns a farm, but they have remained hardcore to the left. It is not that non-farming rural residents strictly hold different views either. What is interesting is that the same shift is observable at the exact same time in the rural southern prairies (like Ontario, the rural northern prairies also remained to the left), so it does seem that there is something, whatever it is, that targeted agricultural areas – although not necessarily farmers, as you point out – to bring on this change.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)