this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
1048 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

14561 readers
1206 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

From my time majoring in Arch, I'd say the rule of thumb is:

"Is the culture the body came from vanished or changed to the point where no one has a personal stake in it."

So for example, vikings are long since gone. Modern northern europeans are generally a completely different culture, therefore not grave robbing. Same with Ancient Egypt, Ancient Rome, etc...

Indigenous tribes in North America and Australia for example, still very much around and still very much grave robbing (though that opinion is controversial)

Basically, if the existing culture still shows reverence to those ancestors...leave them alone. If the existing culture no longer honours them as ancestors, dig baby dig.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is your intent to learn from and preserve a lost culture, or profit off of stolen goods?

I feel like it's pretty simple.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Even if there was something to learn I don't want anyone digging up my grandma. If someone's descendants are saying "Don't do that to our ancestor's grave, it's disrespectful in our culture" then you're defiling a grave.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"I swear, the feet from this ceramic were missing when I found it."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I feel like it should be simpler: did the culture the body came from have good enough records in other ways that we would be unlikely to learn anything by digging up the body that we couldn't learn by studying other records? Then leave it alone.

If they failed to keep good enough records, and knowledge would be gained by the study, then study away.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought these days it was less digging and more radar/sonar type stuff? Trying to preserve the original site or something.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

likely yes. I was in university in the late 90s. My knowledge is very out of date.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That would usually be done before digging. Only after learning all you can through deep soil scans and confirming structural integrity so as to not have it break upon moving it. Then you may dig it up.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess that as long as nobody complains, it isn't grave robbing.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What if she was the one stealing your grave?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i would awake from the dead to hand over my treasures

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok but what if instead… it was her?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I wouldn’t complain if she robbed my booty

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't I think she will be as it is hard to do so while getting experimented by government officials as she clearly is not human . I mean look at her .

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This model has way too many polys. 230 or gtfo.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't follow archeology directly, but every couple months I listen to the Unearthed! episodes of Stuff You Missed in History class, which goes over the prior quarter's archeological news. A whole section is dedicated to reciprocations, because there are tons of complaints. UK museums still refusing to send back stuff stolen from other lands, items found to have been illegally taken, etc.

So it's more if nobody the people who run the place cares about complains.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah, everybody knows about the British Museum.

AKA Return the Moai 🗿🇨🇱

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a government permit thing, not a time thing. If you go an dig up an Etruscan grave on your own it is absolutely grave robbing.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah but that's just putting the problem of defining it onto governments.

If a court orders the exhumation of a murder victim, is that technically archeology?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm true. Adam Savage would say it's whether or not you're keeping notes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I reject your reality and substitute my own!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Actually yes...it is.

Law enforcement often employs archaeologists for that very purpose. My professor in Uni for example would go help them out whenever they got a call about a body being found because there just weren't enough murders in my part of the world to justify having someone full time.

The skill-sets are virtually identical, the bones are just fresher. Reading a crime scene and reading a archaeological site are basically kissing cousins.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, a court ordered exhumanitions of a murder victim is not grave robbing, so your example in the 2nd paragraph just makes the point that there are in fact more categories than "grave robbing" and "archeology".

And yeah, governments often definite who owns what (since in natural terms, plenty of things such as land cannot be possessed) and hence directly or indirectly what is robbery.

(Which brings the interesting question of "who owns the grave" so that taking from it is robbery).

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think it's more about intent and what you do with the findings and who gains from it. If you and your team announce your plans ahead of time, document everything meticulously, deliver the pieces to a museum or archive, publish papers and deliver seminars and attend conferences on it... it's probably archaeology. The public then has at least some access to the value of your work.

If you and your associates do it all in secret, sell the artifacts to some rich asshole (esp. via a fence), and cover your tracks, that seems a lot more like grave robbing. You've stolen all the value in that case.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Hmm, sounds like a lot of the Egyptian Pharoah 'research' a few centuries ago.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'll set a timer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Archaeologists can’t afford zydrate, so they resort to grave robbing.