this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
927 points (100.0% liked)

Greentext

6136 readers
1388 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Belgium 100% won that war

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

I mean, the only reason they lost was because they decided to fight Russia in the winter and Japan attacked the US too early, meaning Germany had to fight on two fronts.

Germans might have won if they kept with their "one at a time" strategy. What a different (even worse probably, if you can imagine it) world that would be.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They fought most of the rest of the world all at once and it was pretty touch-and-go there for a bit.

If Hitler had died of a meth overdose in early 1940 I could see the universe of 'The Man In The High Castle' coming to pass.

As it stands, meth heads gonna meth, and he decided fighting on 2 fronts was fine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Tbf they did good for most of it

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›