this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
1184 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23457 readers
3102 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Veteran 60 Minutes anchor Scott Pelley reported on Donald Trump’s efforts to strong-arm some of the country’s top law firms into doing his bidding on Sunday night’s episode of the embattled CBS newsmagazine.

Pelley’s segment pulled no punches in describing Trump’s efforts and reminding viewers that Trump is the “first felon” ever to sit in the Oval Office.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 131 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This is what every journalist in America needs to be doing right now.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I would argue it's what every journalist in America should have been doing 8 FUCKING YEARS AGO, but no, they helped create this monster so they could report on it. They are a human/media centipede crossed with an Ouroboros eating it's own shit. Support independent media, not partisan sources in either direction, they're ALL compromised by capital.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 6 days ago

OK, but this is also what every journalist needs to be doing right now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

(I wanted to "like" this comment, but it was at 69 likes, and I thought that was very nice) ⬆️

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Its at 72 now you can upvote it safely

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

OH CAUSE ITS THE SEX NUMBER

THAT IS FUCKIN FUNNY MAN WOW

[–] [email protected] 107 points 6 days ago

It's insane, because it's not some sassy or hyperbolic report. It's perfectly measured and...logical. A well made report.

[–] [email protected] 85 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Jesus Christ. What subject, other than abject flattery, is Trump not sensitive about? No matter what they do, any story that's based remotely on fact is gonna piss that fragile little man off, so why not just have at him?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Make no mistake, the only reason we're seeing this in the media now is because big business is getting hit. Mostly a shot in the foot with tariffs but let's keep those boycotts up!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

I assume the big boys lost more money from the tariff insanity than they made from getting their next tax cut. Losing money is the only thing they do not tolerate because it hurts them in their inhouse pissing contest on who can be the biggest societal parasite.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Absolutely. This kind of media is owned (literally) by big business investors. I know it's obvious but it needs to be said plainly, mass media is the mouthpiece of the rich. It's no coincidence that Musk bought Xitter and Bezos bought Washington Post.

They will only cry alongside us when they're being hurt. They sure didn't care until now.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Extortion of law firms. What the fucking hell scared these businesses so much? Just stopping federal contracts with them?

And with that threat looming overhead, how do they not have the motivation to quietly resist? You want to talk about respecting the law and fighting back - that's who needs to do it.

Except they bent the knee anyway. We know they're just as complicit in the Regimes acts now.

And that's just one issue.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A lot of cowards in powerful positions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s a shit spot to be in, as basically all of them work cases in federal court. If your lawyers are physically prevented entry to federal property because some orange buffoon bans the entire firm by the stroke of a pen, that law firm is completely impotent and unable to argue in federal cases, even those that don’t end up in a courtroom. Judges chambers, pre-trial motions, informal meetings, etc all are impossible or vastly more difficult.

It was a very targeted and deliberate move to put these firms in a lose:lose scenario - give an absurd amount of pro-bono work to your abuser, or wither and die as your clients are forced to move to another firm:

The orders threatened to bar attorneys from where they work, courthouses and federal agencies and cancel the contracts of law firm clients. For example, an aerospace company could lose its federal contracts if it stayed with the firm. A senior partner at one firm told us the president's orders were, quote, "diabolical." "Intended to bankrupt [us]."

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago

Man that's such a small detail I glossed over, that they can bar them from courthouses.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I never realized until Trump came along how strong the urge to lick boots is in humanity - because if anyone is in exactly the right position with the capabilities and know how it these high-powered firms. And yet they'd rather supplicate themselves? Pathetic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

Lawyers and law firms lean very very heavily on relationships. Far too much honestly. Who your lawyer knows really shouldn't matter when it comes to legel matters, but often it means more than the law. So being in the sights of the leader of the republican party really reduces the image of a lawyer with connections. Thus it is very very bad for business.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 6 days ago

Glad legacy media still has a few balls left

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 days ago

Only nine years too late.

Still, hope this marks the start of a trend.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Trump is the biggest piece of shit America has ever produced.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Richard Nixon has entered the chat

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 days ago (20 children)

Nixon didn't do shit compared to Donald

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 days ago

They hurt TRUMPS FEELINGS? DEPORT THEM!

-Fuck Your Feelings Conservatives!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago

I hate 60 minutes but watched that on YouTube. Anything to piss on trumps shallow ego.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago

Good on Pelley.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago

That pesky first amendment comes back to bite again!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Anyone have a link to th video?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-orders-target-law-firms-some-lawyers-say-that-threatens-rule-of-law-60-minutes-transcript/

I suspect it's this one. Looks like 60 minutes posts their show online on their website.

Edit-- turns out they also publish the show as a podcast (which I prefer)

60 Minutes

https://antennapod.org/deeplink/subscribe/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.megaphone.fm%2FCBS5826355202&title=60+Minutes

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

As I always say, that'll teach'm.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Ah, so more compromised media sources creating hype and WWE theater spectacle out of a crisis they helped create.

I am done with the "nightly news segment" Uroboros of creating massive problems then reporting on the massive problems they made.

edit: keep whinging, this is just another "cut to YOUR fighter" segment that makes everything think "whoohoo we're winning!" and feeds this cycle of thinking someone is in control, that there's an actual "back and forth." There is no "back and forth." There is nobody coming. There is nobody in charge. This is all so much worse than even the best media reporting is letting on.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Shut the fuck up with that.

Networks and even shows aren't a giant monolith.

This is a good, ballsy move by actual journalists that is going to upset a lot of people and get a lot of pushbavk, even from within.

This should be getting acclaim, not...whatever lazy defeatest response this is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ah so more defeatist thinking then? Good job.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago

My only hope at this point is that, by firing most of NOAA, they somehow miss or are otherwise unprepared for a freak hurricane that blows right through DC while congress is in session and Trump is doing a photo op while signing a new bullshit order.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

60 Minutes finally found their spine? They’ve been barely tolerable for a while now with poor reporting. Looks like getting attacked personally was what it took to hit back with actual accuracy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

With any luck this gives the fat orange duck a fatal heart attack.

load more comments
view more: next ›