this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
34 points (94.7% liked)

Hacker News

3943 readers
1 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haven't we been in this era for over a decade now?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I think this is the execution phase, compared to the data gathering phases

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

And worse, ai interpretation of the data.

The nuances of jokes and “knowing your audience” will be entirely lost.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In an editorial for Slate published Monday, renowned security researcher Bruce Schneier warned that AI models may enable a new era of mass spying, allowing companies and governments to automate the process of analyzing and summarizing large volumes of conversation data, fundamentally lowering barriers to spying activities that currently require human labor.

In the piece, Schneier notes that the existing landscape of electronic surveillance has already transformed the modern era, becoming the business model of the Internet, where our digital footprints are constantly tracked and analyzed for commercial reasons.

Generative AI systems are increasingly adept at summarizing lengthy conversations and sifting through massive datasets to organize and extract relevant information.

Despite assurances of privacy from these companies, it's not hard to imagine a future where AI agents probing our sensitive files in the name of assistance start phoning home to help customize the advertising experience.

It signifies a shift from observing actions with traditional digital surveillance to interpreting thoughts and discussions, potentially impacting everything from personal privacy to corporate and governmental strategies in information gathering and social control.

In his editorial, Schneier raises concerns about the chilling effect that mass spying could have on society, cautioning that the knowledge of being under constant surveillance may lead individuals to alter their behavior, engage in self-censorship, and conform to perceived norms, ultimately stifling free expression and personal privacy.


The original article contains 743 words, the summary contains 226 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!