Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6207 readers
241 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

The paper is here

2
 
 

Access options:

3
4
5
6
7
 
 

Come on. You know why.

8
9
10
11
12
 
 

Since this community is about being constructive, let me start off by saying there is a Canadian bill which passed in June 2024, Bill C-70, which can lead to harsher penalties for environmental activism and protest, including life-in-prison. A thread has been created to ask Lemmy users to coordinate and collaborate on creating a petition asking to undo the effects of that bill.

See https://mander.xyz/post/26781834

Now for quotations which may be the most relevant to this community.

https://sencanada.ca/Content/Sen/Committee/441/SECD/briefs/SECD_SM_C-70_Brief_CBACJS_e.pdf "I am writing on behalf of the Criminal Justice Section, (CBA Section) to comment on Bill C-70, Countering Foreign Interference Act. The tight deadlines before the Parliamentary Committees have only allowed time for a brief comment on the criminal offences component of the Bill at this time."

"The CBA is a national association of over 40,000 lawyers, law students, notaries and academics, and our mandate includes seeking improvement in the law and the administration of justice. The Criminal Justice Section consists of a balance of Crown and defence counsel from every part of the country. "

"The Canadian Bar Association Section is also concerned about s. 52.1(2)(i) which deals with the sabotage offence. This section vests the executive with the power to prescribe, through regulation, what constitutes "essential infrastructure" for the purposes of the offence. This leaves a key element of the offence to regulation and thus subject to the whims of the government of the day. More particularly, some political parties have been critical of, for example, foreign environmental group involvement in resource development."

https://sencanada.ca/Content/Sen/Committee/441/SECD/briefs/2024-06-10_SECD_SM-C-70_Brief_CCLA_e.pdf "an environmental protest group which blocks a road to a significant natural resource development may impede access to energy and utilities infrastructure (s. 52.1(2)(d)) and could be accused of seeking to endanger Canada’s security (under proposed s. 52.1(1)(a)). Or, a civil rights group whose protest blocks several major vehicular intersections in a city may impede access to transportation infrastructure (proposed s. 52.1(2)(b)), which, it may be argued, represents a serious risk to public safety (proposed s. 52.1(1)(c)). These are not speculative examples. A broad definition of national safety is contained in other federal legislation. Under s. 3(1) of the Security of Information Act, for example, a “purpose prejudicial to safety...of the State” includes adversely affecting “the stability of the Canadian economy…without reasonable economic or financial justification”."

"It is also important to note the distinction between motive and intent in the criminal law to appreciate the limited scope of the s. 52.1(5) criminal liability exemption. Even if a person acted with the purpose of protesting or advocating on a particular issue, they satisfy the requirement to act with intent if they were certain or substantially certain their act would cause any of the harms enumerated under proposed s. 52.1(1)(a) to (c). In such cases, the sabotage (essential infrastructure) offence would still apply to them."

13
 
 

Ok folks. This might be a big one.

The court opinion is here

Green Climate Coallition had signed billion dollars worth of grant contracts with the Biden administration. The funds were released by Citibank.

They sue Ed Martin for freezing their assets on "waste" and "suspected" fraud grounds. The situation has been developing for a couple weeks.

Coverage seems to imply that Martin, who "within hours of becoming interim US attorney for DC on President Donald Trump’s Inauguration Day used his powers to dismiss pending January 6-related cases, fire prosecutors and start an interval review for 'possible misconduct'", seems to be under the impression they are Trump's and Musk's personal army of lawyers.

Martin ordered a senior prosecutor, Denise Cheung, to freeze assets in a Citibank account serving a consortium of Green energy contractors who had signed a contract with the Biden administration.

Earlier, Martin had pressured Cheung, who eventually resigned, to criminally investigate the contractors, without probable cause.

Cheung wrote that she was asked on Monday to review documentation provided by the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG) — currently headed by acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove — “to open a criminal investigation into whether a contract had been unlawfully awarded by an executive agency” during former President Joe Biden’s administration.

Cheung wrote that she was then told that the ODAG representative would work directly with a federal prosecutor and "bypass" the D.C. U.S. Attorney's Office, before being informed that a "freeze letter" requesting that a bank freeze certain assets "would be adequate at this point, as opposed to other legal process."

Cheung wrote that she contacted a supervisor in the FBI Washington Field Office, and they and others discussed "what, if any, possible criminal charges might be applicable, as well as the sufficiency of the evidence."

Cheung wrote that she was then told that the ODAG representative would work directly with a federal prosecutor and "bypass" the D.C. U.S. Attorney's Office, before being informed that a "freeze letter" requesting that a bank freeze certain assets "would be adequate at this point, as opposed to other legal process."

Cheung wrote that she contacted a supervisor in the FBI Washington Field Office, and they and others discussed "what, if any, possible criminal charges might be applicable, as well as the sufficiency of the evidence."

Rachel Maddow, in a cryptic segment, implies that Martin is "in trouble" for "the one thing they want to get away with".

Maddow further states that this story is more "scary" than its "boring" details would have you believe, and shows how far is the overreach of Trump's loyalist top federal prosecutor.

If anyone can be prosecuted without sufficient evidence of a crime, simply for not being in the favor of Donald Trump, and have their assets frozen without due process, she concludes, it can be the first chapter of a dystopia for journalists and activists, and any organization not "loyal" to Trump.

14
 
 

Access options:

15
 
 

Not just a bit of snow mind you. We are talking a couple of inches. So not some flurries or a slight coating. Thats it. Just had to share.

16
17
 
 

“We wanted the town to decide its future, not the government,”

The establishment of the Just Transition Working Group (JTWG) in 2019 – and its state-run secretariat the Collie Delivery Unit (CDU) – was a pivotal moment. The JTWG brought together all the partners in the transition – the community, employers, government and unions. “We had everyone at the table,” said trade unionist McCartney. “Decisions could then be made without going back and forth to Perth.”

Sub-committees tackled specifics, from job creation to retraining, ensuring every worker had a personalised plan.

18
 
 

geteilt von: https://lemmy.ml/post/27419926

The authors hit out at a “growing portrayal of protesters as alleged threats to democracy rather than a vital part of public participation.”

Two major Acts of Parliament – the Police Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 and the Public Order Act 2023 – have “changed the legal landscape” for protest drastically over the past few years.

19
20
21
 
 

Access options:

22
 
 

Police spent over £3m and deployed over 1,000 officers from nearly every force in the country in order to arrest 24 climate activists, Novara Media can reveal.

In August 2024, as the country was gripped by far-right riots, cops swooped on activists planning to hold a mass protest camp near Drax – a power station in north Yorkshire accused of greenwashing.

Police stopped vehicles heading for the camp and made arrests for “public order offences relating to interference with key national infrastructure”. They seized equipment such as compost toilets, wheelchair access ramps and camping equipment.

The protest camp, organised by campaign group Reclaim the Power, was to involve “six days of workshops, communal living and direct action to crash Drax’s profits”. Following the arrests, the camp was cancelled.

150 environmental organisations signed a statement accusing the police of acting as “private security” for Drax, while activists said the sting showed the police had the wrong priorities.

A spokesperson for Reclaim the Power said: “In Yorkshire this morning, police prioritised locating and arresting people suspected of organising peaceful protest with tents, toilets and track for wheelchairs over locating and arresting people who are actually organising far-right riots.”

15 of those arrested face plea hearing at Leeds magistrates court on Thursday, charged with conspiracy to lock on. They deny the charges.

A freedom of information (FOI) request shared with Novara Media can now reveal the scale and cost of the operation.

1,070 officers were deployed during Operation Infusion – the codename for the operation. This includes 334 from North Yorkshire Police, 100 from Police Scotland and 57 from the Metropolitan Police. Officers from 39 police forces were involved in the operation – nearly every constabulary in the country.

North Yorkshire Police used contractors to provide accommodation, vehicle hire, hire of portaloos, carparking, skips and fencing. The names of the contractors were exempted from the FOI request. The total cost of the operation was £3,168,432.

Kevin Blowe, campaigns coordinator at the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol), said: “The scale of the police operation shows how much money the police are willing to throw at shutting down a protest before it even takes place.”

In July 2024, Drax had secured an injunction which created a “buffer zone” against the threat of direct action protests around its north Yorkshire power plant. The plant has been a magnet for protesters for years, with previous protests against Drax infiltrated by undercover police officers.

Some of the arrests in August were made for conspiracy to “lock on” – when protesters attach themselves to people or buildings making it difficult to remove them. “Locking on” was specifically criminalised for the first time by the Public Order Act 2023, brought in by the Conservative government which cited “groups such as Just Stop Oil and Insulate Britain” to justify its crackdown on protest.

Blowe said: “In 2024 there was a marked rise in the use of conspiracy charges to arrest campaigners for the newly introduced or expanded offences included in recent anti-protest legislation. Invariably this is because they were associated with groups targeted for ongoing police surveillance.”

Blowe is the author of a forthcoming report which claims that aggressive policing and the portrayal of protesters as threats to democracy has grown so routine and so severe that it amounts to state repression. He said: “Events at Drax last summer are one of the reasons why, for the first time, we are calling this state repression: measures to disproportionately deter, disrupt, punish or otherwise control protesters, campaign groups and entire social movements, with a total disregard for their human rights.”

A spokesperson for North Yorkshire Police said: “Whilst part of our role is to facilitate peaceful protest, we also have a responsibility to minimise disruption and prevent a breach of the peace.

“There is an ongoing court case relating to the operation in question, so it would be therefore inappropriate to comment further at this time.”

Drax used to be the UK’s biggest coal fired power station. It has transitioned to use what the company claims is “sustainable bioenergy”, but it has been found to burn wood from “old-growth” forests, pumping huge amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. It has also been accused of “environmental racism” as its toxic wood processing plants are mostly based in poor communities of colour in the southern United States.

In February, the government extended subsidies for Drax until 2031 to the dismay of environmentalists and communities in the southern United States.

Simon Childs is a commissioning editor and reporter for Novara Media.

23
24
 
 

This post uses a gift link which may have a view count limit. If it runs out, there is an archived copy of the article

25
view more: next ›