Progressive Politics

2254 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

A new unregistered political group has jumped into the Wisconsin Supreme Court race, flooding cell phones across the state with text messages targeting transgender children.

The texts say they were paid for by "Win Wisconsin, Win the Future." No group by that name is registered with the state, the Federal Election Commission or the Internal Revenue Service.

"Hi I've been asking all my friends this question. Should parents have the right to know if their child is transitioning genders at school?" the texts begin. "This election will decide which way the court goes on important issues such as parental rights."

The text includes a photograph of a woman comforting a child, over the words, "ISSUES LIKE THIS COULD BE DECIDED BY THE WI SUPREME COURT." A new unregistered political group is flooding cell phones across the state with text messages targeting transgender children.

The texts do not say how children could be transitioning genders at school without their parents' knowledge, nor do they explicitly say whether they are supporting conservative Waukesha County Judge Brad Schimel or liberal Dane County Judge Susan Crawford. But the issue of "parental rights" has become a rallying cry among conservatives, who have also run recent high-profile campaigns, including for president, by targeting transgender children. More: Republicans take up votes on transgender youth bills. What will Democrats do in wake of 2024 election?

Kate Mikkelsen, a parent of a transgender child in the Milwaukee area, pointed to her rights as a mother.

"It's interesting that they frame it as parental rights," she said. "I wish to maintain my parental right to get my child the healthcare I as a parent along with their doctor believe is best."

She said school districts have their own policies on informing parents of a child's request to go by a different name or pronoun, and that districts that don't mandate telling the parents are making those decisions on the basis of child safety "in case the child does not have a safe home for non-conforming gender expression." She added that schools have "no ability or capacity to aid in any other part of transition, certainly not any medical steps."

"As for using this topic to get out the vote in favor of a conservative judge candidate, well, it's gross," Mikkelsen said. "It's using children (and their rightfully anxious parents) as pawns. Grown ass adults using kids (who are braver than them!) for their political gain is really low."

She added, "It's a very small, marginalized group of kids and families who just want to live their lives."

The texts are being sent in the final weeks before the April 1 election, which will decide whether liberals or conservatives control the state's highest court. More: All our reporting on the Wisconsin Supreme Court race between Susan Crawford, Brad Schimel

Crawford campaign spokesman Derrick Honeyman slammed billionaire Elon Musk, saying, "Schimel's allies are desperately trying to deflect" from his record, citing his handling of a backlog of thousands of rape kits and past sentencing decisions.

Because the group behind the text messages is unregistered, there's no evidence that Musk is tied to it.

"Elon Musk is pouring in millions of dollars to prop up Brad Schimel, and now this latest secretive outside group is trying to influence the race," Honeyman said. "Judge Crawford is a mom who has always fought to keep our kids safe, and on the Supreme Court, she will look at the facts in every case and be a fair and impartial justice."

The Schimel campaign did not respond to a request for comment about the texts.

This marks the second time that an obscure, unregistered third-party group has attempted to influence the Supreme Court race.

Starting last month, a group called Progress 2028 began airing deceptive digital ads and sending out text messages supposedly backing Crawford. The ads label her a "progressive champion" who will "stand up for immigrants," defend Planned Parenthood and promote a justice system that gives criminals "second chances."

But records show the ads and text messages are underwritten by Building America’s Future, a political nonprofit funded largely by Musk, who is running President Donald Trump’s effort to slash the size of the federal government.

Two Musk-funded groups — Building America’s Future and America PAC — have spent more than $11 million on behalf of Schimel.

The title for the fake pro-Crawford group is portrayed as the liberal answer to Project 2025, the detailed conservative blueprint from the Heritage Foundation for Trump's second term.

Progress 2028, however, does not appear to be registered with state or federal election agencies or the IRS.

It began running three new digital ads on March 7 that praise Crawford for “being the judge we need to stop mass incarceration” and “the judge we need to block Trump’s agenda.” The group has five inactive Crawford ads on Facebook and Instagram.

Schimel was asked about his position on transgender issues Tuesday during a Rotary Club of Milwaukee event at the War Memorial Center.

The question, which was submitted by a member of the audience, asked how he could claim that he would be a justice for all while supporting "anti-trans equality initiatives."

"I don't have any position on who people are, who they identify as, who they love, that is all their business. Not mine," Schimel said. "And whatever the law says is what the law says on that."

When asked about transgender rights by PBS Wisconsin, Crawford said that if a case came before her, she would need to research the laws, listen to the attorneys' arguments and then "make a decision based on what the facts and the law required."

2
 
 

The Trump administration aims to "ultimately collapse the system" that allows tens of millions of Americans to collect their earned Social Security benefits each month, said one leading advocate for the system Wednesday after officials announced a major change to the Social Security Administration.

Acting SSA Commissioner Leland Dudek claimed the agency needs to "identity-proof" Social Security beneficiaries as he told reporters that millions of people will now be required to verify their identities using an online system—and will have to provide documentation at local field offices if they're unable to use the SSA website's verification system.

The change is set to take effect March 31 and comes as President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, his billionaire ally whom he named to lead the so-called Department of Government Efficiency( DOGE) with the aim of slashing government jobs and spending, have baselessly claimed that the Social Security system is riddled with fraud and sends benefits to millions of deceased Americans and to undocumented immigrants.

A source at the SSA told Judd Legum, author of the newsletter Popular Information, that there are "no significant concerns about fraud at intake" and said the change is aimed at creating "additional hurdles to filing claims and [overwhelming] the system."

Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, noted that for decades, senior citizens and people with disabilities who rely on Social Security payments have been able to verify their identities over the phone when applying for benefits.

"The new process would force seniors and people with disabilities to navigate a needless technical hurdle in applying for their earned benefits. If these claimants (who do not always have computers or smartphones, reliable internet service, or the technical skills to complete the process online) cannot verify their identity online, they would have to call SSA via the already overburdened phone line to set up an appointment, and travel in person to an SSA field office," said Richtman.

"The combination of fewer workers, fewer offices, and a massive increase in the demand for in-person services could sabotage the Social Security system."

With DOGE pushing to cut 7,000 jobs within the SSA and close at least 47 regional and local field offices, the change would particularly harm the ability of people in rural areas, with mobility limitations, and with limited internet access to obtain their monthly benefits.

"The combination of fewer workers, fewer offices, and a massive increase in the demand for in-person services could sabotage the Social Security system," said Legum, who reported on the SSA memo on Monday.

Doris Diaz, the SSA acting deputy commissioner for operations, is among those who have warned Dudek against forcing seniors to verify their identities online, saying the change would cause longer wait and processing times and would send an estimated 75,000-85,000 beneficiaries to increasingly understaffed field offices per week.

Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, which works to counter right-wing claims about Social Security and lobbies to strengthen the system, told Common Dreams that "despite Leland Dudek's claims, the only thing putting the American people's personal Social Security data at risk is that Dudek turned it over to DOGE operatives."

The new plan "will make it far harder for the American people to claim their earned benefits. It could even cause major delays, and ultimately collapse the system, by overwhelming the field offices," said Altman.

"It is part of what appears to be an ongoing effort to cause Social Security to collapse," she added.

Richtman said that the only "rational conclusion" regarding the coming change in SSA operations is that Trump and Musk want to "undermine public support for Social Security by rendering the SSA dysfunctional, so that the program can be squeezed for cash, cut, and privatized."

"Intentionally erecting obstacles for the people who've earned these benefits (and who pay for SSA operations with every paycheck) betrays at the least an indifference—and more likely, an outright hostility—to the elderly, people with disabilities, their families, and survivors who rely on Social Security," said Richtman. "One has to ask why the world's richest man—who has received in the tens of billions of dollars in federal contracts—is targeting the agency that helps so many Americans keep their heads above water financially."

3
 
 

Trump took a shot at being a shady car salesman Tuesday during a press event for Tesla at the White House. The president posed for photos behind the wheel of a Tesla he apparently can’t drive with a grinning Musk, remarked with astonishment that “everything’s computer” in the futuristic vehicles, and even read from what appeared to be a sales pitch sheet listing prices for different Tesla models.

Trump’s desperate show of fealty toward the bouncing billionaire came after Tesla stock plummeted 15 percent Monday, drying up the very last drops of Musk’s postelection gains and costing him a whopping $29 billion.

But it seems Trump’s rather unpresidential measures to boost Tesla’s floundering stock could serve a greater purpose: keeping the not-so liquid Musk from defaulting on his loans.

The Washington Post reported in April 2022 that Musk had already used more than half of his more than 170 million Tesla shares as collateral to acquire loans, and planned to do so again to borrow more money to buy Twitter, now X.

Musk acquired X for $44 billion in October 2022, borrowing roughly $13 billion from several banks, including Morgan Stanley, Barclays, and Bank of America. Musk’s loans had been “hung” on those banks’ balance sheets for nearly two years, longer than some unsold deals from the 2008 financial crisis.

Reuters reported last month that interest in acquiring Musk’s debt increased after Trump secured the White House and Musk emerged as his number two. At the time, only $1.3 billion remained on the banks’ sheets.

In a 2024 SEC filing, Musk was listed as holding a whopping 238,441,261 shares of Tesla stock that were “pledged as collateral to secure certain personal indebtedness.” At the time, he held ​715,022,706 shares in total, according to the filing, meaning that roughly one third of Musk’s shares were serving as collateral for his loans.

It’s unclear exactly how much of Musk’s shares are held in collateral now. Musk currently owns 410 million shares of Tesla stock, a roughly 12.8 percent stake in the company, according to Investopedia. The value of those shares, including those held as collateral, appears to be dropping every day he plays pretend as the unelected bureaucrat leading the Department of Government Efficiency.

Here’s where Musk’s problem emerges: If the stock price goes low enough, the banks Musk borrowed from could force him to sell his shares.

Tesla warned that this could happen in its annual filing in 2022, according to The Washington Post. That, in turn, could make things even more dire for the car company.

“If Elon Musk were forced to sell shares of our common stock that he has pledged to secure certain personal loan obligations, such sales could cause our stock price to decline,” Tesla wrote.

“We are not a party to these loans,” the company added.

It already seemed like Musk was going to have trouble paying back his loans for X. Last year, the social media company reported that its value had plummeted by more than half, to around $19 billion. When the banks formulated a plan to restructure the loan, X didn’t follow through, The Wall Street Journal reported at the time.

Tesla stock was doing slightly better on Wednesday, as a result of an uptick in the wider market caused by a report that inflation had eased slightly in February.

4
 
 

Call your senators, they can still block this despite Schumers push. The vote is tomorrow. If all republican vote for it, they need 7 dems. 8 with Rand Paul who has said he’ll vote no. (Republicans are not using reconciliation so it needs the the filibuster)

Many senate dems are publicly coming out against voting for cloture (meaning they won’t vote to let it get through the filibuster). As of what I last read, around 11 dems are thought to potentially vote to let it pass filibuster. Most of those are still not sure. We only need a handful more of those to become noes and it will get blocked. Some yeses have flipped to noes because of public pressure. We cannot let up now

Link to find direct numbers your senators

https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm

Or call the capitol switch board (202) 224-3121

House dems are publicly telling the senate not to do this (and it’s not just AOC on this - it’s quite a few of them). Earlier read that 7 Dem state AGs are saying the same. Federal worker unions are telling senate dems not do this. Keep the pressure up

5
 
 

The FBI is moving to criminalize groups like Habitat for Humanity for receiving grants from the Environmental Protection Agency under the Biden administration.

Citibank revealed in a court filing Wednesday that it was told to freeze the groups’ bank accounts at the FBI’s request. The reason? The FBI alleges that the groups are involved in “possible criminal violations,” including “conspiracy to defraud the United States.”

“The FBI has told Citibank that recipients of EPA climate grants are being considered as potentially liable for fraud. That is, the Trump administration wants to criminalize work on climate science and impacts,” the @capitolhunters account wrote Wednesday on X. “An incoming administration not only cancels federal grants but declares recipients as criminals. All these grantees applied under government calls FOR ENVIRONMENTAL WORK, were reviewed and accepted. Trump wants to jail them.“

The Appalachian Community Capital Corporation, the Coalition for Green Capital, and the DC Green Bank are just some of the nonprofits being targeted.

“This is not fraud. This is targeted harassment,” @capitolhunters continued. “The idea of criminalizing community climate work wouldn’t have originated at the FBI—it likely comes from EPA director Lee Zeldin, who today cut all EPA’s environmental justice offices, which try to reduce pollution in poor and minority communities.”

Zeldin’s order eliminates 10 EPA regional offices as well as the headquarters in Washington, D.C.

6
 
 

Text and links from Raskin's site:

U.S. Representative Jamie Raskin is encouraging all U.S. citizens to join him this week in filing formal demands for access to their personal data obtained by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and Elon Musk.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has issued an injunction commanding DOGE to comply with citizen requests under the Freedom of Information Act. This law encompasses the Federal Privacy Act of 1974, which entitles any citizen to access personal information held in any U.S. government records system. Please find a fillable Privacy Act request form HERE.

Citizens need only fill out the form and mail it in to DOGE. This newly recognized federal agency, which has been systematically accessing government computer data systems, now has an obligation to respond to specific information demands from any of the 340 million U.S. citizens who exercise their legal right to defend their privacy and establish the security of their private information.

Once you have mailed a Privacy Act Request to DOGE, please fill out the form HERE and we will stay in touch with additional details and updates as they become available.

7
 
 

Link above is to full youtube of the CSPAN coverage of the talk with the FIFA president. Trump lays out this banger at 2:25.

8
 
 

The former head of Kazakhstan’s intelligence service, Alnur Mussayev, recently claimed in a Facebook post that Donald Trump was recruited by the KGB in 1987, when the 40-year-old real-estate mogul first visited Moscow.

The allegation would, if true, be a bombshell. Mussayev provides no documentary evidence —but then how could he? He alleged that Trump’s file is in Vladimir Putin’s hands.

Mussayev isn’t the only ex-KGB officer to have made such an assertion. Several years ago, Yuri Shvets, a former KGB major now resident in Washington, D.C., served as one of the key sources for Craig Unger’s best-selling book, “American Kompromat: How the KGB Cultivated Donald Trump, and Related Tales of Sex, Greed, Power, and Treachery.”

Just after Mussayev made his claim, another ex-KGB officer living in France, Sergei Zhyrnov, categorically endorsed the allegations in an interview with a Ukrainian journalist. According to Zhyrnov, Trump would have been surrounded 24/7 by KGB operatives, including everyone from his cab driver to the maid servicing his hotel room. Zhyrnov said that Trump’s every move would have been recorded and documented, and that he could have been either caught in a “honey trap” (“All foreign-currency prostitutes were KGB — one hundred percent,” he said) or perhaps recorded bribing Moscow city officials in order to promote his idea of building a hotel in the Soviet capital.

None of these former KGB operatives has provided evidence, but the fact that three KGB agents located in different places and speaking at different times agree on the story suggests this possibility should not be dismissed out of hand. If there’s one thing we’ve learned from the first Trump administration and from the initial weeks of the second, it is that everything, including what appears to be impossible, is possible.

Also lending credence to the allegations is the fact that kompromat on Trump would easily, simply and convincingly explain the president’s animus toward NATO, Europe and Ukraine, his admiration of Vladimir Putin and his endorsement of authoritarian rule. One could even invoke “Occam’s razor,” the philosophical principle that claims that simple explanations should be preferred to complex ones.

We could then dispense with contorted explanations that focus on Trump’s mercurial and narcissistic personality on the one hand and American party realignments on the other. Indeed, even if true, these explanations could be accommodated as bells and whistles adorning the central narrative propounded by three KGB agents.

Naturally, Trump and his supporters will bristle. Surely, the three KGB agents are on somebody’s payroll. Who wouldn’t want to discredit the U.S. president? It could be the CIA or FBI, except that these are now firmly in the hands of Trump loyalists. Besides, would they have the ability to buy or coerce residents of Kazakhstan and France? Ditto for other Western intelligence services.

Perhaps it’s Putin? But he surely has no interest in undermining a president who supports his policies toward Ukraine, NATO and Europe.

Somewhat more plausible would be an officer or officers within the Russian intelligence community who oppose Putin and Trump’s designs. This version seems unlikely, but only at first glance, since we know that Putin’s seemingly impregnable regime is actually riven with cracks.

But why would a clandestine opposition make up a story and convince Shvets to spill the beans several years ago? Wouldn’t the dissidents know it’s true?

Perhaps all three ex-KGB agents are simply lying, in the hope of attracting attention and bolstering their fame? A resident of Washington might have this motive, but a Kazakh and Frenchman?

What leads me to think that there might be something to the allegations is the fact that an acquaintance had a very similar experience at just the same time. A left-leaning ladies’ man, he was wined and dined in Moscow for several years in the late 1980s, courted by the ladies — by his round-the-clock interpreter, as well as by a woman who approached him in a department store and invited him home.

We’ll probably never know the truth. But even with no slam-dunk evidence, the allegations should be, to say the least, disturbing, especially for the genuine patriots in the MAGA camp.

9
 
 

Comrade Peter Griffin

It’s been over 150 years since Karl Marx published Das Kapital, yet its relevance has only grown stronger. From exposing capitalism’s contradictions to influencing global political movements, Marx’s work continues to shape economic and social debates. But why does Das Kapital remain so impactful, and what can it teach us about today’s world? In this video, we break down the core ideas of Das Kapital, surplus value, class struggle, and the inevitability of capitalist crises—to understand why Marx’s analysis remains indispensable in the 21st century.

10
 
 

Link above goes to the Daily Kos post that discovered the scrubbing. Here's the text of the original article:

Former Intelligence Officer Claims KGB Recruited Trump

Isabel Van Brugen – The Daily Beast – 21 February 2025

A former Soviet intelligence officer has alleged that Donald Trump was recruited by the KGB in 1987 and given the codename “Krasnov.”

Alnur Mussayev, 71, a former Kazakh intelligence chief, made the explosive claim in a Facebook post on Thursday. He claimed that he served in the 6th Directorate of the KGB in Moscow, which was responsible for counter-intelligence support within the economy. One of its key objectives, he claimed, was “recruiting businessmen from capitalist countries.”

Mussayev wrote that in 1987 “our directorate recruited Donald Trump, a 40-year-old American businessman, under the pseudonym Krasnov.”

He reiterated that the department specialized in recruiting spies and intelligence sources from the West, asserting once again that Trump had been brought into the fold.

“I hope I’ll survive a third assassination attempt,” he said in a comment below his post.

He made another shocking allegation in another comment, saying: “Today, the personal file of resident ‘Krasnov’ has been removed from the FSB. It is being privately managed by one of Putin’s close associates.”

Mussayev’s allegations, while unfounded, add to ongoing speculation about Trump’s connections to Russia. Trump’s first visit to Moscow as a real estate developer in 1987 drew intense scrutiny and speculation that the trip was arranged by the KGB for dubious reasons.

According to Politico, in 1985, the KGB updated a secret personality questionnaire distributed among the agency, advising case officers what to look for in a successful recruitment operation.

The document instructed agents to target “prominent figures in the West” with the goal of drawing them “into some form of collaboration with us… as an agent, or confidential or special or unofficial contact.”

Trump has denied any improper ties to Moscow or collusion with President Vladimir Putin.

The Daily Beast has reached out to the White House and Russia’s Foreign Ministry for comment.

U.S. officials have also expressed concerns about Trump’s relationship with Putin.

Anthony Scaramucci who briefly served as Trump’s White House communications director in 2017, said during an episode of “The Rest Is Politics: US” podcast with co-host Katty Kay on Friday that he thinks there is a mysterious “hold” on the president.

Scaramucci did not elaborate on what he believes that “hold” might be, adding only: “I don’t know why it’s like this. [H.R.] McMaster couldn’t figure it out, [James] Mattis couldn’t figure it out, [John] Kelly couldn’t figure it out.”

11
 
 

Thousands of workers across the country hit the streets this week to declare their opposition to Trump and Musk who, under the guise of “efficiency,” are slashing and burning public services.

12
 
 

Speaker after speaker, including foreign conservative leaders from around the world, paid homage to Trump and this message.

13
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25897060

Generated Summary Below:


Video Description:

2024 Green Party VP candidate and University of California Santa Barbara professor Butch Ware return to Bad Faith to discuss his run to be governor of California and concretely evaluate what it takes for third parties to win big against the two party duopoly. But first, the historian offers his analysis of the Kendrick Lamar Super Bowl halftime show, and whether it was genuinely "revolutionary" as claimed.


Generated Summary:

Main Topic: Analysis of Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl LVII Halftime performance, focusing on whether it was subversive, revolutionary, or a mere commercial spectacle. The discussion also expands to broader themes of Black representation in mainstream media, the role of artists in political movements, and the state of American politics.

Key Points:

  • The Performance's Ambiguity: The discussion centers on the multifaceted interpretations of Lamar's performance. Some view it as subversive due to its cultural references and the context of its presentation. Others argue it lacked revolutionary political impact, despite Lamar's past statements about the revolution being televised. The use of Samuel L. Jackson as Uncle Sam is a key point of contention, with some seeing it as a meta-commentary on minstrelsy and others viewing it as problematic.
  • Revolutionary vs. Subversive: The conversation distinguishes between revolutionary and subversive acts. A key argument is that a truly revolutionary act would not be possible within the constraints of a Super Bowl halftime show, a highly controlled and commercialized platform. The spontaneous act of Zul Carnain, a dancer who displayed a Palestine flag, is highlighted as the only genuinely revolutionary moment of the performance.
  • Black Representation and Commercialization: The discussion explores the complexities of Black representation in mainstream spaces like the Super Bowl. Concerns are raised about the potential for co-opting Black culture and imagery for commercial purposes, diluting the power of genuine political statements. The performances of other artists, such as Beyoncé, are referenced in this context.
  • Political Commentary and the Role of Artists: The panelists debate the extent to which Lamar's performance made a meaningful political statement. Some argue that simply being Black in that space is a political statement, while others contend that it fell short of revolutionary action, lacking explicit calls for change or concrete political demands. The conversation touches upon the history of politically charged hip-hop and the influence of record labels on artists' ability to express radical views.
  • The State of American Politics: The discussion expands to a broader critique of the American political system, particularly the Democratic Party. The panelists express deep disillusionment with the Democrats' handling of social and political issues, accusing them of prioritizing corporate interests over the needs of marginalized communities. The rise of fascism and the role of the Green Party are also discussed.

Highlights:

  • The insightful and nuanced discussion of the complexities of Kendrick Lamar's performance and its various interpretations.
  • The passionate and critical analysis of the role of Black artists in mainstream media and the challenges of balancing artistic expression with political activism.
  • The sharp critique of the Democratic Party and its perceived failures to address systemic issues of inequality and injustice.
  • The introduction of Butch Ware, a Green Party vice-presidential candidate, and his campaign for Governor of California, offering a perspective on building a viable third-party alternative to the Democratic and Republican parties.

About Channel:

based on the hit tv show

With Briahna Joy Gray

14
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25896753

Generated Summary Below:


Video Description:

#dogestimuluschecks #sabbysabs #medicarecuts #pentagoncuts #donadltrumpnews


Generated Summary:

This YouTube video discusses Donald Trump's proposal for a $5,000 stimulus check per household, alongside proposed cuts to the Pentagon budget, Medicare, and Medicaid. The video analyzes the proposal's context, potential impacts, and controversies.

Key Points:

  • Stimulus Proposal: Trump's suggestion of a $5,000 stimulus check is linked to alleged government waste and mismanagement of funds, totaling trillions of dollars. The video references Dr. Dee Curtis's call for taxpayer refunds due to this mismanagement.
  • Pentagon Budget Cuts: An 8% cut to the defense budget is proposed to fund Trump's priorities. The YouTuber speculates that these cuts will likely affect staffing rather than weapons procurement.
  • Medicaid and Medicare Cuts: Proposed cuts to Medicaid and Medicare are heavily criticized by the YouTuber, who argues that such cuts would negatively impact many Trump supporters and are a politically unwise move.
  • Telehealth Cuts: Changes to Medicare telehealth services, limiting access for non-rural residents, are also highlighted as a negative consequence.
  • Job Losses: The video discusses job losses resulting from government budget cuts, emphasizing the impact on disabled veterans and non-probationary employees.
  • Elon Musk's Role: The YouTuber points out a conflict of interest, suggesting that Elon Musk is benefiting from government contracts while advocating for cuts in other areas. This includes SpaceX and Tesla contracts.
  • Political Implications: The video analyzes the potential political ramifications of Trump's proposals, particularly the impact on his approval ratings and the potential alienation of his base due to the proposed cuts to social programs.

Highlights:

  • The YouTuber's strong opinions and detailed analysis of the various proposals and their potential consequences.
  • The inclusion of clips from various sources, including Dr. Dee Curtis and Jasmine Crockett, to provide different perspectives.
  • The discussion of the historical context of stimulus checks under previous administrations, particularly the Trump administration's increase of the initial $600 stimulus to $2,000.
  • The focus on the potential negative impact of the proposed cuts on vulnerable populations, such as disabled veterans and Medicare/Medicaid recipients.
  • The critical assessment of Elon Musk's role and potential conflict of interest in the situation.

About Channel:

Leftist news commentary and interviews. Fighting for political and social change. Sabby Sabs podcast is a part of Revolutionary Blackout Network.

15
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/22456731

We need to use our momentum from getting out the vote for Jill Stein's antiwar pro-worker campaign to fight the rich and their two parties. To end the wars and the genocide in Gaza. To fight against racism, sexism, and all forms of oppression. To organize protests and strike actions to win a $25/hour minimum wage, Medicare for All, quality affordable housing, and good union jobs for all.

Both Democrats and Republicans are a dead end for workers, the union movement, and the antiwar struggle. We urgently need a new, independent, antiwar, working-class party that can take on the billionaires & warmongers and BREAK the two-party system.

Register now for Workers Strike Back's February Organizing Conference SATURDAY, Feb 22 @ 10 am PT!^[[1] https://www.workersstrikeback.org/events/feb-2025-organizing-conference]


Link to signup for event: https://www.workersstrikeback.org/events/feb-2025-organizing-conference


Title Edit: To Be Announced -> Langston Hughes Performing Arts Center

16
 
 
17
 
 

Not to go full Robin Williams gif, but there are fewer real reasons why the 2024 Election map looks like it does than you’d be led to believe.

18
 
 

“An unnervingly large percentage of the agency will be sympathetic to what Patel wants to do,” a former FBI agent tells Rolling Stone

19
 
 

The only two sources with headlines that mention Musk called him retarded are Salon and Daily Beast. The Hill did say that Musk called him an idiot. All the rest just say they're fighting and that Morgenson called out Musk's lie. Why does everyone have to sugarcoat and 'both sides' everything?!?!

20
 
 

Trump is woefully ignorant of international law and the law of occupation. Forcible displacement of an occupied group is an international crime, and amounts to ethnic cleansing.

21
 
 

With the money tap unexpectedly turned off, outlets around the world are panicking, turning to their readers for donations, and thereby outing themselves as fronts for U.S. power.

Perhaps the country most affected by this sudden change in policy is Ukraine. While criticizing the decision, Oksana Romanyuk, the Director of Ukraine’s Institute for Mass Information, revealed that almost 90% of the country’s media are bankrolled by USAID, including many that have no other source of funding.

Anti-government Cuban media have been plunged into a similar predicament. Miami-based CubaNet published an editorial asking readers for money. Last year, CubaNet received $500,000 in USAID funding to engage “on-island young Cubans through objective and uncensored multimedia journalism.”

A recent survey of 20 leading Belarusian media outlets found that a staggering 60% of their budgets come from Washington.

In Iran, U.S.-backed media have already had to fire workers. A BBC Persian report noted that more than 30 Iranian groups held a crisis meeting to discuss how to respond to the aid cuts.

Like in Iran, anti-government Nicaraguan media is highly dependent on subsidies from Washington. U.S.-backed Nicaragua Investiga condemned Trump’s decision as a “serious blow”

22
 
 

Trump finally decided to end the GOP’s internal quarreling on how to pass his budget—and broke a huge promise on Medicaid in the process.

For months, Republicans have been split on whether to split Trump’s massive budget agenda on the military, border security, and tax cuts for corporations into multiple, incremental bills (Senate Budget Chairman Lindsey Graham’s preferred method) or combine them into one “big beautiful bill” (the House’s preferred method).

The president settled that debate with a Truth Social post on Wednesday morning.

“The House and Senate are doing a SPECTACULAR job of working together as one unified, and unbeatable, TEAM … unlike the Lindsey Graham version of the very important Legislation currently being discussed, the House Resolution implements my FULL America First Agenda, EVERYTHING, not just parts of it!” the president wrote. “We need both Chambers to pass the House Budget to ‘kickstart’ the Reconciliation process, and move all of our priorities to the concept of, ‘ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL.’ It will, without question, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

But the House bill Trump endorsed breaks his promise to never touch Medicaid, levying a whopping $2 trillion cut to the budget, including an expected $880 billion cut to the critical health program, in order to pay for tax cuts for the rich.*

“Social Security won’t be touched, other than if there’s fraud or something. It’s going to be strengthened. Medicare, Medicaid—none of that stuff is going to be touched,” Trump claimed as recently as Tuesday, during his and Elon Musk’s sitdown with Fox News’s Sean Hannity.

Some moderate Republicans have already come out against a bill that would slash Medicaid, which could leave thousands of their constituents without reliable access to care.

“​​I ran for Congress under a promise of always doing what is best for the people of Northeastern Pennsylvania,” Representative Rob Bresnahan wrote on X last Friday. “If a bill is put in front of me that guts the benefits my neighbors rely on, I will not vote for it.”

23
 
 

WLWT

24
 
 

The president's early actions are rubbing some of his swing voters the wrong way.

25
 
 
view more: next ›