this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
194 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

8014 readers
569 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wait, why is Fedora making their own flatpaks? I thought the entire point is that they work on any distro and everybody gets the original source from flathub.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (2 children)

IMO, same reason they have their own repo, which eventually feeds into Red Hat enterprise, to have a trustworthy, curated set of safe (ish) software that's had eyeballs on it. A worthy enough goal, but that said, it applies a lot less to flatpaks. I personally used to remove theirs because I didn't like having multiple sources, now I'm on Bazzite which ships with flathub.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago

This is pretty much how Ubuntu turned into the shitshow it is now.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

I don't see much of a reason to create a customized flatpak, since at this point you might as well just create a binary for dnf.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago

I asked this exact thing somewhere else, and the best answers I got were:

  • there is a somewhat legitimate motivation for fedora to package their own flatpaks in the context of their atomic desktops project.
  • they started doing this before flathub was established, and it was a better idea at that time.

So, as per usual with Linux, there are some obscure and historical reasons this is a thing, but it is useless for the majority of users. Fedora should really not have it configured as the default source for flatpaks out of the box