World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
All of anyone who has been in politics long enough has taken some kind of bribe.
Source?
Get some new material.
In this day and age someone asking for proof of a statement isn't something you should deride, because there's too many lies flooding the world rn.
How do you think a person could prove secret bribes? They’re secret. They get uncovered all the time, but until they do, no one knows. That’s the whole point.
I think it’s naive of them to assume the best of a politician. The absence of a list of secret data does not make it an untrue opinion.
Then don't state that every politician has accepted bribes without providing facts to support it.
This is on you buddy, not me.
It not on anyone.
Yes, it's in you to prove this fact, or this is just your cynical opinion.
Perhaps you're anti-democracy and have zero idea of how bad corruption can really get under an autocracy.
It’s an opinion. It’s your opinion that it’s cynical. It’s my opinion that you’re naive and in denial if you think politicians aren’t being bribed. Bribes come in all sorts of sizes and packages.
I’m not anti-democracy, I’m just aware that money/power corrupts most people—especially these days.
In that case the source is clearly your arse.
Me: Politicians frequently accept bribes
You: lol fUCKin SoUrCe?
Yup.
You said All politicians take bribes. Not lots of politicians take bribes or many or some, all.
I think it's quite reasonable to ask for a source to such a sweeping statement. The fact you can't provide any evidence shows it's just your opinion.
You’re welcome you have your opinion. That’s what the internet is for.
And your welcome to yours. There's also nothing wrong with me asking for evidence when you portray your opinion as objective fact. However, you seem to have ridiculed me for doing so.
“Source?” Welcomes asshole behavior. Adjust your approach, and you’ll find people are more willing to behave nicely and have quality conversations.
Oh ok.
Can you back up your ballshit generalisation with some evidence?