this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
1481 points (100.0% liked)

Greentext

5779 readers
1053 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1481
Murica (lemmy.ml)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Anons argue in comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

Humans are actually unusually energy efficient for mammals when walking and even more so when cycling. Here's a little info graphic showing a breakdown.

One thing to keep in mind if you have a dog is they're less energy efficient than humans. While dogs can run faster, a reasonably fit human can easily out distance an equally fit dog when walking or distance running.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

Nice graphic. ~~But it seems like it doesn't factor in kg of mass moved. A human and a bike is a lot lighter than a car or a horse. You could also argue that the vehicle weigh should be ignored but then again you could easily argue back that weight of goods move can possibly be a lot higher with a car if you load it up to capacity~~. Ignore that. I did not see it said 5 riders for the car

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

I'm back with better data. I'm assuming the travel path is perfectly flat because I don't feel like modeling elevation changes. I'm being energy efficient (read: lazy).

For cycling, I'm using the global average human weight of 62 kg, assuming the cycle is 8 kg, and the pace is 10 kph, which is pretty relaxed.

For walking, I'm using the 62 kg person walking at 4 kph.

For driving with petrol, we'll use the same spherical 62 kg human and a 2024 Toyota Prius with a fuel efficiency of 4.8 L/100 km and a mass of 1570 kg. One liter of petrol is approximately 8174 kcal. Double the energy expenditure for an estimate for your typical SUV.

For electric, I chose a 2024 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N with an energy efficiency of 21.2 kWh/100km and a mass of 2235 kg. One kilowatt-hour is approximately 860 kcal.

Walking: 0.74 kcal•km^-1^•kg^-1^
Cycling: 0.34 kcal•km^-1^•kg^-1^
Driving(p): 0.24 kcal•km^-1^•kg^-1^
Driving(e): 0.08 kcal•km^-1^•kg^-1^

Edit: keep in mind this includes the energy required for each vehicle to move its own mass. If we calculate the energy required just to move a single person and NOT the vehicle, we get:

Walking: 0.74 kcal•km^-1^•kg^-1^
Cycling: 0.38 kcal•km^-1^•kg^-1^
Driving(p): 6.32 kcal•km^-1^•kg^-1^
Driving(e): 2.96 kcal•km^-1^•kg^-1^

Only in an electric car jammed with 5 people (0.59 kcal•km^-1^•kg^-1^) do we begin to get close to walking efficiency again.

@[email protected]: this update might be closer to what you're looking for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

If only I could up vote your comment again. These numbers are really nice to have.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)