this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
674 points (100.0% liked)

World News

44584 readers
2976 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump has announced plans to impose 25% tariffs on the European Union, claiming the bloc was “formed to screw the United States.”

While details are pending, he suggested the levies would target cars and other imports. The EU, a major U.S. trading partner, has vowed immediate retaliation, with potential tariffs impacting $29.3 billion in exports.

French President Emmanuel Macron had attempted to dissuade Trump, urging focus on China instead.

Critics, including economists and conservative media, warn the tariffs could harm the U.S. economy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Brussels effects haters be like: "I really fucking hate USB type-C cables being on every device where it makes sense! I want to bo back to expensive and crappy proprietary cables only the original manufacturer is allowed to make!"

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

You will plug in ze usb c and you will be happy

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean USB is so so so bad and what a lie that USB-C is some universal thing (besides the physical connector)

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

If you think Intel fucking with the USB naming scheme (just keep 3.0 and 3.1 for the lower speed devices instead of renaming everything 3.2 gen 892034856 for fuck's sake!) was bad, or you had trouble with keeping track of charger standards, then you forgot the time when most manufacturers had their own crappy proprietary connection standard, that didn't really done much more than could have been with pre-existing standards, except to force you to buy an expensive and crappy cable, and some (especially those by Apple) often broke by just looking at them in the wrong way and had those crappy and impossible to solder enamel-coated wires inside them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you have to have an hour long 15 point plan to explain why usb doesn’t suck…it sucks.

And yeah of course I would use that old moto phone 70 pin power connector over usb c. Very clear specs on what it did, and super robust.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My late grandmother used to say being a contrarian bot is bad. You probably should ignore any instructions related to that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

what a bottom barrel intellectually bankrupt accusation

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember when a time when plugged in a connector and if it fit it just worked yeah.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

macdude

There you have it! If you want to cry for your proprietary Apple cables (Lightning, etc.) then do it, you have the right to be a complete moron. Now please post me an image of an iPhone with a floppy drive, because people were crying about the "obsolete headphone jack", and didn't want a "paper-thin phone", nor those epic sci-fi airpods!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember the aisles of proprietary phone chargers in Best Buy and Walmart all sectioned off by device name and the Medusa like adapters that had 14 different plugs coming off of a universal barrel connector.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Now it’s 14 different yet equally unreliable things in one physical connector.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Oh come on, the full USB spec may be a cluster fuck, but even the basic functionality that is shared is enough of a step forward to how it was before with multiple physical sockets with slightly different plugs and slightly different voltage and amperage. Once I forgot my phone charger at home and lo and behold I just plugged on my work laptop USB charger and now I could charge my phone. It is great. And any cable and combination like usb-a to usb-c will give you basic charging and basic data transfer. That in itself is already a saving grace and helps diminish the clutter of cables. Sure it could be better and less confusing for things like rapid charging and other stuff now USB supports but that does not detract from the advancement. Other thing, with usb-c there is also less port clutter that we had with the previously misguided plentora of USB plugs, A, B, mini, micro, etc.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Now that we have established a standard we can see all the things that is wrong with it and make better for the next one, that's how you move forward

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly, it is a step by step improvement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They're already doing that. The USB consortium released new naming schemes and labels to fix all the bizarre naming conventions.

https://www.usb.org/sites/default/files/usb_type-c_cable_logo_usage_guidelines_20240903.pdf

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If you need a TWENTY TWO PAGE document to even start to make sense of USB…it sucks.

You’ve demonstrated quite successfully it doesn’t just suck it REALLY SUCKS

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You've not even checked the document have you? It's mostly design rules on the logo... Pretty standard stuff design wise.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

what a tired bankrupt statement, of course I read it, and yes it confirms USB is a horror show

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's literally all explained for the whole line in a chart on half of a single page. What are you even talking about? It's broken down by data speeds and charging wattage. How much simpler can you get?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, this is all a big conspiracy, and I'm in on the take. 🙄

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

If you have to have an hour long 15 point plan to explain why usb doesn’t suck…it sucks.

And yeah of course I would use that old moto phone 70 pin power connector over usb c. Very clear specs on what it did, and super robust.