this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
164 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

4834 readers
3 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You can find all of these videos as written articles, plus some extra content, at https://thelibre.news/ You can the channel grow by donating to the following platforms: Paypal: https://paypal.me/ni...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de 6 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

The company itself is not for profit. The CEO gets payed way too much, but a for-profit company would return money to the owners (mostly shareholders/investors), which Mozilla is not

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

That is a very American definition of for profit.

Here in Germany, a non-profit is not allowed to do any profit. They are allowed to cover their costs, that's it. (Of course it is more complicated but that is the essence).

For years and years, Mozilla is doing shady stuff.

Let's for example look the way how they enabled DoH. Or their decision to let themselves pay by google for making google the default search engine. Or now, spinning up their own ad network.

And on the other hand, if google does something like their new ad auction stuff (that is run completely in your browser and the api is open btw) than there are only bad intentions, according to some folks.

If we keep argumenting this way, Mozilla will make itself the very thing we hate, and we are loosing a very important alternative to chrome

So, now, I am not willing to give them any more slag. They have to change

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Google the company only has bad intentions, despite what many working for Google might want to achieve. It’s proven time and time again that it couldn’t care less about anything other than profit, and if you don’t think profit over everything isn’t nefarious, then we just disagree.

That said, I agree with everything else you said.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Just to clarify. Google is not good. Google sees us as the product.

But: just because it is this way, misrepresentation of a real privacy feature, just because it is Google, is still bad. And treating Mozilla with silk gloves does make this worse, because it seems to lack objectivity.

And we, as a privacy loving, opensource breathing, community can not campaign for our goals successfully if we lack objectivity in communication.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)