acockworkorange

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

I think it goes “found cool stick, decided to keep it”.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

What a beautiful bitch.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago

Them at Tanagra, their sails unfurled.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So the universe is about unravel. Cool cool cool cool cool cool… I didn’t have anything to worry about anyway.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

When I read your comment, the post already had a link. I guess they added after reading your comment.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I don’t think so. At least I couldn’t find anything on my settings app.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IIRC, it uses a free (libre) font license. So you’re free to do pet much anything. Changing the font might have some restrictions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look at the negative for the film id. Nice capture.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

Really? Is there an alternative that hits all the points above? I’m really asking.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you answered the wrong comment in the thread.

 

Basically no sellers I’ve seen whether their Pixels can have their boot loader unlocked. So how did you get yours and how can I avoid getting a lemon?

 

Voyager implement all searches that lemmy exposes, but this one is something else. When in a browser with a post loaded, I can search the post and its comments for any text with the browser “search this page” feature.

I wanted a text search on Voyager in a similar fashion, i.e. client side full text search on what’s on screen at the moment.

 

Mint has a really good deal on Pixels now. They say that their phone auto- unlocks after 60 days. Anybody have experience with those? Is the bootloader locked? If so, does it unlock after 60 days?

 

I need to change phones. It seems the holy grail of privacy on phones is GrapheneOS, but it only works on pixels, which are huge compared to my already awkward iPhone 13 mini (5.2 x 2.5 in / 132 x 64 mm).

Is there any phone out there that is fast, small, and easily supports a privacy OS?

Thanks!

 

My current phone (iPhone 13 mini) is telling me to retire it, and I want to get into Graphene. I really dislike that my phone sometimes will just hang while I’m swipe typing and don’t want to buy a new one that has these latency issues. I also don’t want to spend a ton of money.

I was looking at the Pixel 8a which is being sold for $500. Anyone else use it with Graphene? Do you use a swipe keyboard? Any responsiveness issues?

What about storage? Coming from Apple, I can see my current phone using about 64GB with OS + apps. Anyone recently made the transition and can tell me if I can expect this number to grow or shrink?

Thanks a bunch!

1
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

What it says on the tin.

 
 
 

cross-posted from: https://midwest.social/post/18380473

October has long been associated with ghosts – from ancient Celtic festivals to ward off restless spirits after harvest time to the modern standby of using an old sheet to make a last-minute Halloween costume. In the middle of the 19th century, however, popular portrayals of ghosts became a year-round staple, in part because photographers discovered that they could depict them.

The first ghost photographs were accidents. Early cameras required 30 seconds or more to take a photo. If someone wandered briefly into the shot, the resulting picture would contain their ghostly trace superimposed over substantial furniture, buildings or people who had held still for the full exposure.

When shrewd photographers realized that the inconvenience of long exposure time could become an asset, detailed directions for creating these illusions proliferated. Photographers could cut ghost figures from transparent material and place them onto glass negatives or inside camera bodies. Or they could make real people half-transparent through tricks of double exposure.

20
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Hi, I had trouble coming up with a title, sorry.

So I met 2 people in an RPG chatroom and we decided to start a game in the near future. We've moved to a separate chatroom to start preparing. This chatroom had been previously used by another player on a similar campaign, but was empty.

Soon after, another persons joins the chat. Reading the chat history, they appear to have been the GM for that previous campaign. I waved at their entry, making my presence known. This was their only text message:

Hi ​__. Good to see you back in the game. I'm interested in playing but I'll let you know straight off; I can only play on . Is that okay for your other players?

This isn't sitting right with me.

  • No introduction.
  • Talking about me like I'm not there.
  • A certain attitude in setting terms to a game they're not organizing.
  • The person they're talking to can't answer the question, and I wasn't addressed, so what now?

Am I reading too much into this? Is this just they trying to communicate efficiently plus a lack of social polish?

Anyway, I'd love some external perspective.

Edit: thanks everyone, I'm glad I took the time to gather your input. I wasn't sure I was reading the situation correctly and it looks like indeed I wasn't.

view more: next ›