this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)

Sysadmin

8460 readers
40 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
12
Time to reassess the vSAN (blocksandfiles.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

As IT leaders move away from VMware, they face a critical decision: do they stick with traditional storage architectures, or is now the time to finally unlock the full potential of an infrastructure that converges virtualization, storage, and networking technologies?

Early convergence efforts centered on hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI), where storage ran as a virtual machine under the hypervisor, commonly called a vSAN. While adoption has lagged behind traditional three-tier architectures, recent advancements have significantly improved vSAN, making it worth reconsidering by addressing past shortcomings.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ceph is also quite tightly integrated on Proxmox for smaller deployments.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yup! Ceph is quite nice once you're up at the ~6 node scale. Openshift Data Foundation is based on Rook, which is a nice way to automate Ceph deployment, as well.

I've actually been running Rook on my home server rack, up to 120TiB now ๐Ÿ˜