this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)
Amateur Radio
890 readers
1 users here now
A Lemmy Community to share links about and for amateur (ham) radio to advance the technology, and promote communication and international goodwill. This community IS NOT for CB, GMRS, MURS, FRS, etc topics unless they are related to ham radio in some way.
We won't tolerate personal insults, illegal activity, or anything contrary to good amateur practice.
If asking questions about regulations, please include your country because we recognize that, while the hobby is international, regulations often aren't.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Likely.. What a waste for a node that someone went through the trouble of putting high up.
Well, that's just what it came with. Once I found that out and mentioned it, they are ordering a low-loss cable so that should no longer occur.
I had a similar experience with RG58 and UHF. I guess the good old tech support wisdom is true: when in doubt, check the cable..
According to something I saw on the internet, RG-316 has 47 dB worth of loss at 3 GHz. So even if it's a third of that at 1 GHz, that's still 15.6 dB per foot, which considering the transmission is only 30 dB or 1 watt, that means that the entire power would be lost after 2 feet of cable.
Late reply, and forgive me if I am over-explaining. I found some random datasheets that say RG-316 has 26-29 dB per 100 ft at 1 GHz. So in the worst case, 3 ft would be 0.87 dB. Doesn't sound like much, but 30 dBm - 0.87 dB = 29.13 dBm = 818 mW, so he is losing 182 mW to the cable. Not great, not terrible.
It definitely should not make that much of an impact. Maybe look into antenna tuning / SWR? Or broken connectors / pinched cables? If my past IT jobs have taught me anything that that it's always the cable, unless it's the plug :)
No prob. Thanks for that info