this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
166 points (100.0% liked)
Economics
816 readers
110 users here now
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A board doing its job would fire Musk as CEO.
He'd still have his shares, but clearly he is not benefitting the company right now.
They have the power to fire musk as CEO and they are choosing not to. They risk being sued by shareholders for breaching their fiduciary responsibility.
It is their fiduciary duty to fire him, but I get what you mean and agree I guess.
Just how much of shareholders' support of Musk grassroots, though? I imagine large institutions wouldn’t care if he’s out as CEO or not, as long as it’s financially optimal.
Sure, but Musk isn't financially optimal for Tesla, and the board has a duty to protect the shareholders. Firing Musk would be doing their jobs of protecting the company from the fallout of Musk's actions.
Also, Tesla shareholders have sued the board, and won, already once.
the board is made up of cronies, like is brother.
This is why you don't hire yes-men.