this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
65 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68130 readers
3981 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I really like that it tracks speed. Being able to tell officials that a significant portion of drivers are speeding seems like a great first step when requesting stop signs or speed bumps.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Speed bumps are such a shitty solution to speeding. I’d prefer speeders to speed bumps.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Personally I'd rather get hit by a car going 10mph than 30. Even better would not be getting hit at all, and lower speed means more time to react.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Giants trucks and SUVs are getting more and more prevalent and don’t have to slow down as much. This trend doesn’t appear to be slowing down. You can’t make the bumps big enough otherwise it’s going to wreck cars. People also haul ass immediately after getting off the bump, so you end up with lovely brake squeals and engine sounds for a few hundred feet of decreased speed. They prematurely wear suspension components and brakes and lead to increased fuel usage.

They’re shit and I’m so glad I’ve moved out of the southern US and back into snow country where speed bumps simply can’t exist. I don’t know why speeding through residential areas is so much less prevalent in the north, where there are far fewer speed bumps, but I love it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

None of that agrees with my own experience. Plows don't seem to have any trouble with them around here, but they still manage to keep traffic slow.

Ideally we'd have streets engineered for traffic calming, but that would take an incredible amount of time and effort in dense areas, so I'll take the speed bumps.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Why not 1mph then?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd rather your car get fucked up than a person.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Dope, I’ll get a large SUV or truck to replace my small hatchback so I don’t have to slow down at all. Larger vehicles improve pedestrian safety right?

Speed bumps are a bandaid being used as a solution. They fuck with emergency vehicles, encourage rapid braking and acceleration, incentivize getting a larger vehicle, reduce gas mileage, and create noise from braking and acceleration. I’ll take literally any other traffic calming measure over a speed bump.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They’re a hell of a lot better than nothing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

They're actively worse than nothing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Speed bumps are pretty much the worst option for speeding. Lane narrowing, adding curves, and lane diets should be preferred, and you can try them out at similar costs with plastic bollards or even cones. That being said if you want speed bumps, install elevated sidewalks instead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I mean those are all somewhat difficult to add in residential neighborhoods...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The problem is the $200+ sensor. I'd love to be able to track this sort of data, but not until doppler radar prices drop.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It’s possible to still track speed using a video feed instead. You just have to know the distance between two static points within the videos frame. Time naught = passes first static point, time final = passes second static point.

Velocity = distance / time

Although I’m not sure how or if this would impact the battery life of the device.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, but I'm not allowed to just video tape the street all day long. A Doppler radar that gives me data to argue for a permanently installed speed control on the other hand would be fine

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Really? At least where I'm located, you're allowed security cameras anywhere there isn't reasonable assumption of privacy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

In Germany you are not allowed to permanently film public space, that includes streets and sidewalks

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Damn! I didn't realize the radar was so expensive.