this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)
Manga
933 readers
33 users here now
This community is for discussions related to manga.
Rules
- Posts must relate to manga or similar (manhwa, etc.).
- Obey the ani.social Terms of Use.
- In general, keep things civil and avoid attacking other individuals.
- Make sure to tag spoilers where appropriate. See here for details.
- Memes should be redirected toward a different, more appropriate community and will be removed. Same with hentai.
- Please avoid linking to Manga Aggregator sites when possible. Stick to linking an official site, a scanlator's site directly, or Mangadex when possible.
Post Tags
Post tags are optional, but are recommended since some frontends can use them to categorize posts. Some recommended post tags:
- [Discussion], [DISC] - chapter discussion threads
- [Art] - Official art from a series or author, OC fan-art is also allowed
- [News] - news updates about series, authors, publishers, etc.
- [RT!] - Read This! posts are posts in which you recommend a series to others. Please provide a short review and information about the series as well.
Related communities
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- Megathread of other communities on the fediverse maintained by @[email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Just read through all the chapters and the story is something else. ~~One of the best out there.~~
After a bit of thought. The story is really captivating. Art really good. But still something is wrong with this manga. The MC isn't kind for the sake of being kind. She doesn't love for the sake of love. This isn't a triumph of Good over Evil. The antagonist could vail in misery over protagonist thriving. But no, here the protagonist plots revange appearing good and benelovent where she actually is evil. That could work if the manga would be presented as philosophical in nature to pause and poneder and not as yet another isekai.
The moral that blatant evil is bad and hidden evil is good just doesn't sit well with me.
One point that I wish to happen before the ending. Extrat the soul of Emi and implant it into clone of Remi or a body of Heroine. Then there would be conflict as Emi is good but Remi is evil.
Remilia to me is the literal personification of hell hath no fury like a woman scorned; I don't see her as inherently evil.
In my worldview revenge is wrong, and this manga paints a picture where revenge is good and outcomes of revenge are good. That fact just doesn't sit well with me.
And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. We just have different opinions. 😊
I read this as pure entertainment, not a story trying to teach a moral and tell you the protagonist's actions are morally okay. Not every story has to have good triumph over evil, or have a good lesson embedded in it. Also, I don't think the story intends you to believe that Remilia is a morally good person at all.
I was entertainment but I very much keep an eye on my information diet. Some information shouldn't be internalized, and I don't want to involuntarily become immoral person.
All media convey some ideas and I am picky what ideas I want to read about. Social media are involuntarily designed to manipulate minds and my opinion on this manga is an extension of that defense mechanism.
I enjoyed my time but wouldn't recommend it to anyone.
To each their own. I feel as long as I personally recognize something is immoral in real life, I don't need a story to explicitly condemn it. I don't think I'll internalize a nonnegative—or even positive—portrayal of a bad act in a story as okay to do in real life.
I do recognize stories change minds, that little me read a fanfic with two men in a romantic situation, and it helped me internalize gay relationships as just normal relationships like any other instead of some weird thing you have to do in the privacy of your home while straight couples could hold hands outside judgment-free. That to people who think gay people are inherently sinners (or not sinners, but become sinners if they act on their feelings instead of repressing them and trying to be single forever/pretending to be straight) this would be "a nonnegative—or even positive—portrayal of a bad act in a story" teaching me that act is okay in real life. Stories can move the needle on what you believe is moral and immoral, yes.
But I'm also an adult with an idea of what is moral and what is not, and I think I'd be harder to win over on things like murder or revenge that I already have strong beliefs about. I can entertain ideas in fiction and enjoy a story without actually taking on the beliefs it seems to hold, or that the protagonist seems to hold (sometimes those things are different! Lolita has the narrator defend his pedophilia, but the story and author want you to think the narrator is disgusting—it is supposed to be an anti-pedophilia story).
I've found a lot of people who believe that anything that's less squeaky-clean than a Sunday school lesson will inevitably do harm and needs to be banned for everyone, not just their own personal consumption, so sorry if I'm coming off defensive. It's perfectly fine to decide this is not for you because you prefer stories with more upright protagonists, a clearer moral, etc. and because you think you might be easily influenced into taking on some bad traits. It is just that I have often seen that attitude pair with "everyone will be easily influenced into immorality by this, so it needs to go"—but I know it won't always.
For what it is worth, I am able to flip off the morality switch in my head and enjoy this revenge manga without feeling the slightest discomfort, while also being adamantly anti-revenge in real life. That was my position before this story and remains so afterwards.