this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
14 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

1386 readers
222 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
14
UserBenchmark bashes AMD GPUs and claims they lack real-world performance (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

AMD's Radeon RX 9070 series GPUs are a welcome addition to the GPU market, assuming you can get one at MSRP. AMD has faced fewer complications than Nvidia's lackluster GPU launch, marred by a shortage of supplies. UserBenchmark has not taken lightly to AMD's and the tech media's supposed antics. In its purported review of the RX 9070 XT, one of the best graphics cards, the website claims that Radeon GPUs fall short in real-world performance while failing to mention the GPU in question even once.

For the uninitiated, UserBenchmark (UB) is infamous in the tech landscape for its radical perspectives versus AMD, which it commonly refers to as "Advanced Marketing Devices." For context, it once recommended readers purchase a Core i5-13600K over the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, asserting, and I quote, "Spending more on a gaming CPU is often pointless."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

For the uninitiated, UserBenchmark (UB) is infamous in the tech landscape for its radical perspectives versus AMD

I don't think this captures the extent or absurdity of the BS they are pulling.

They will always conclude AMD is worse if not straight up bad. They did this to a point where people started questioning whether they are paid by Intel. They intentionally manipulate results to portray AMD in the worst way possible. If there is no (semi-)subtle way to do so, they just make random stuff up.

Do not even visit this site. Their testing is bad, their conclusions are wrong, seemingly all they want to do is mislead you. The way to avoid this is to avoid them.