this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

1372 readers
152 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why is AMD comparing their 48Gb professional cards to Nvidia's 24Gb gaming cards? They do know Nvidia makes 48Gb cards, don't they? (the A5880 & A6000)

They specifically picked models which take up more than 24Gb VRAM, so the Nvidia cards would have to use system RAM. They did the same thing with their Strix Halo benchmark.

This is why no one takes AMD seriously in AI.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I assume comparison was done based on cost, not RAM amount parity, which makes sense because its price/performance you’re most interested in usually.

But on the flip side, the 48GB RDNA 3 GPU is less than half the price of the closest current-generation 48GB Nvidia GPU you can buy today, the RTX A6000 Ada.