this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
2467 points (100.0% liked)

me_irl

5730 readers
885 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I’m pretty sure every country on earth would respond to a hostile force amassing troops & missiles at their border.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

The fundamental difference here is between a sovereign nation pursuing defensive alliances versus an aggressive invasion violating international law. Ukraine wasn't "amassing troops & missiles" at Russia's border as an hostile threat - it was seeking security guarantees after Russia had already annexed Crimea in 2014 and fomented separatist movements in eastern Ukraine. National sovereignty means countries get to determine their own security arrangements, and Russia's "security concerns" don't justify violating Ukraine's territorial integrity or dictating its foreign policy choices.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s not a sovereign nation. The US installed a far-right puppet regime in the 2014 Maidan Coup, which triggered the Crimea invasion.

Funny that folks who claim to support Ukrainian sovereignty don’t give a shit about them being under a western thumb.

And where is the "non-puppet" that was removed during the Maidan Revolution hiding these days?

load more comments (3 replies)