this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
1230 points (100.0% liked)

World News

44758 readers
5576 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

"American Pie" actress Jasmine Mooney, a Canadian citizen, was detained by ICE while attempting to renew her work visa at the U.S.-Mexico border on March 3.

She described the experience as a "deeply disturbing psychological experiment," including sleeping on a mat with "aluminum foil wrapped over my body like a dead body," being transported in chains, and receiving inedible food.

Officials allegedly told her she was "unprofessional because I didn't have a proper letterhead" on her paperwork.

After her release, Mooney credited media attention and her support network for securing her freedom.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess you just slept through the War on Terror, then.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

your original statement is correct, but i feel the need to speak up on behalf of obama.

the terrorist kill list was a little shady, but it was effective (although messy).

we really need to embrace the power of martial force for good. the good guys can't always take the high road. sometimes there is no better solution than to just apply a hammer.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Respectfully, Obama literally ordered the assassination of an American citizen.

Obama was an essential part of normalizing these extra-legal power grabs and the authoritarian state, and this is partly why Trump is able to get away with similar crimes.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You're more respectful then the person you are responding to deserves.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

People are less likely to listen to your point of view if you don't approach them in good faith. I wish Democrats would learn this lesson.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Huh? That other person seems calm and respectful too. What do you mean?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They're attempting to justify the unjustifiable.

They're polite and calm about it, you're correct. But those words pertain to how information is transmitted, not something that can be used to consider the morality of the information contained therein.

Do not confuse a kind way of saying horrible things as making the horrible things not horrible.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

do i really need to explain the nuance of this to you?

was it idealistically right? no. was it acceptable collateral damage in war? yes.

we firebombed entire civilian cities in WWII and we were the good guys. perspective is important.

EDIT: i do agree with you about how we have allowed the power of the executive branch to expand to a point that is now a crisis, but i will still defend obama as a president.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

You can defend him all you like, I voted for him too but he's still part of the problem

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don't think bombing campaigns in WWII are comparable to a president ordering illegal assassinations of American citizens by fiat.

You can justify it to yourself if you like, but it's not an opinion that these crimes have normalized the activities of Donald Trump. (Though it was a 20+ year process that, IMHO, started with George W. Bush and 9/11)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i'm not disagreeing with you. i'm just trying to bring some nuance to some of the statements that have been made.

and you keep saying that is was an authorized assassination, which is not true. it was collateral damage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It absolutely was targeted.

Why are you saying it wasn't?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

because the american citizen was not the target. an al-quaeda operative was the target. the kid happened to be in close proximity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/world/middleeast/07yemen.html?hp

But, by all means, please continue lying.

You may be mistaking him for one of his children whom we've also killed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Well, thank you for your perspective.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the terrorist kill list was a little shady, but it was effective

This is "effective" as well. For Musk/Trump.

Doesn't make it okay.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it's okay when the good guys do it. it's not ok when our enemies do it. goose and gander comparisons should never be made if it justifies your opposition. i'm just trying to get people to understand how wars work. "by any means necessary" is what it takes to win. if the victory defeats an existential threat to humanity, then whatever it took to do it was justified.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Everyone thinks they're the good guys. The people of the US cast GW Bush, then Obama, now Trump in the good guy seat and these tools were on the table.

The whole problem with your philosophy of "the ends justify the means" is that that way of thinking is in itself an existential threat to humanity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

of course everyone thinks they're the good guys. no one thinks they're the villain, but you and i know who the good guys are, right? no? well, you can end up in a pile with the rest of my enemies.

you don't get it, do you? whoever wins the war we are in gets to decide who the good guys were. there is no compromise. there never could be. it's always been a war. and it will be over when one side capitulates. don't be on the losing team.

you think the other side won't do whatever it takes to win? they're doing it now. do you want them to win? then you need to be prepared to do whatever it takes to stop them. THIS IS HOW WARS WORK. don't think we're in one? you're delusional.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

don’t be on the losing team.

Really was not expecting to see an openly fascist US nationalist on Lemmy of all places, but I guess it was only a matter of time.

well, you can end up in a pile with the rest of my enemies.

If I wanted to be threatened by some bootlicker child from the other side of the world, I would be on the chans or playing Rust.

We're done here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you still don't seem to grasp the point i'm trying to make.

how do you think we defeat the fascists? with hugs?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

You don't beat them by being them.

You also don't win by lying about Obama assassinating American Citizens intentionally.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's horseshit used to justify sweeping your mistakes under the rug

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the point is that it takes messy solutions sometimes. we need to come to peace with that if we want to truly resist the current administration. you can't stay on your high horse forever if you want to survive.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Those "messy solutions" are real convenient for White America I've noticed. I wonder how willing you'd be to accept "collateral damage" if it was your hospitals and weddings getting bombed.

This is liberal garbage and a huge part of the reason America is so hated.