this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
888 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45154 readers
3484 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Canadian citizen Jasmine Mooney was detained by ICE for two weeks despite having a valid U.S. work visa. Stopped at the San Diego border, she was abruptly arrested, denied legal counsel, and held in freezing cells before being transferred to a private detention center.

She witnessed systemic inefficiencies, inhumane conditions, and detainees trapped in bureaucratic limbo.

After media attention and legal intervention, Mooney was released.

Her experience highlights the profit-driven nature of private detention centers and the broader failures of U.S. immigration enforcement under Trump’s administration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why would those employees ever go to Canada to work or study (to need visas). There's nothing to swing at.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People already bitch about not being able to go to Canada because they got a DUI. This is will absolutely cause someone's vacation plans to be fucked up. But more importantly this should be a policy of the EU and Mexico too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Afaik place of employment doesn't come up when they scan the passport. Criminal records? Yes.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

They can absolutely get their hands on names and add them to the list of people not allowed to cross the border.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There's more employees than just the border guards themselves. There's the HR, the IT, Accountants, Legal etc etc. Block all of them. If those services are contracted out, ban their workers as well. Might be a bit troublesome with companies like Amazon or Microsoft, but since you're banning individual workers rather than whole companies it might work out a little easier.

Make it so the deal is "If you associate with this company and you aren't a Canadian citizen, you are personally not allowed to enter Canada"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Who ever said it's limited to guards? The whole point is why would they being going to Canada for work or study, which is what requires a visa. You don't just meander over the border for a day of work.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you're working around the northern border, then yeah, you probably go into Canada once in a while.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Most Americans don't even have a passport. And even if they did, you don't need a visa for vacations to Canada. He is limiting this to Visas which means work and study.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You absolutely need a visa. Just because you don't personally have to apply does not mean you aren't on a visa. And Canada already has a blacklist at the border. Adding more names is super easy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You do not need a Canadian passport, a Canadian visa or an eTA to enter Canada if you are travelling with a valid U.S. passport.

https://ircc.canada.ca/english/helpcentre/answer.asp?qnum=1116&top=16

For tourist visits to Canada of less than 180 days, U.S. citizens do not need visas. Other types of travel generally require visas. Visit the Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) website for current information.

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/international-travel/International-Travel-Country-Information-Pages/Canada.html

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're imparting general information to the general public. You are absolutely on a tourist visa while you are there and they can (and do) deny entry and deport people. You do not have some kind of right to visit Canada just because you are American.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can deny entry when they scan your passport and see your criminal record JFC. Or for whatever other reason. That's not the same as a visa JFC. I mean if you're going to literally ignore what's right in front of you. I've never seen such a stunning example of dunning kruger.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're right in the details, but I do have to question for how long.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The detail? That a visa is not the same as allowing/denying entry? That's not detailed or complex information.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From a high level, "There is a process by which undesirable people can be denied entry" covers both "A visa is required to enter the country" and "A passport and not being on a watchlist is required to enter the country." So yes, you're correct, no tourism visa is (currently) needed for Americans to enter Canada. Also, yes, the other guy is correct that mechanisms can relatively easily be put in place to stop undesirable Americans of a variety of types from entering the country.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Mechanisms to deny entry is not the same as a visa. He thinks it is when he says "You do not have some kind of right to visit Canada just because you are American" and it's not. Period. I can't believe I need to have this conversation twice. I'm out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're the guy who is saying Americans wouldn't get work permits, yet a substantial number do every year. And while guards may not do that much, there are a lot of ancillary types who likely would. HR, facilities management, construction, security systems, and others I'm sure can and have opted to work in Canada at one time or other for a variety of reasons.

So there, now you both can be wrong, too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why do I bother but fine

At this point Canada should be playing hard ball. Ban all visas from anyone working for those companies, or anyone who delivers services to those companies for as long as they work for those companies. If they lie about who they work for, the ban is permanent and they personally are not allowed to set foot in Canada ever.

If they currently work for that company, why would they get a work or study visa for Canada. His statement was those workers specifically, as long as they are currently working there. And if they stop working there to get another job or go to school, guess what they are no longer currently working there. (I wonder if this is where you be extremely pedantic and say there can be a small overlap where they work there but apply for a visa to go to school etc slightly before they quit.)

Ok really I'm out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Right around 50-50, actually, but I'll bet you people near the borders are more likely to have one, for some crazy reason.