this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
164 points (100.0% liked)

World News

44584 readers
3764 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rural regions account for 43 percent of the world's population – estimated to be just over 8 billion, at the last count – and if the calculations in this new study are correct then the number of unaccounted-for people could potentially stretch into the billions.(...)

"We were surprised to find that the actual population living in rural areas is much higher than the global population data indicates – depending on the dataset, rural populations have been underestimated by between 53 percent to 84 percent over the period studied."(..)

ad: "Not everyone is convinced. Scientists who weren't involved in the study told Chris Stokel-Walker at New Scientist that improvements in satellite imagery and the quality of data collecting in some countries would make these discrepancies smaller."(..)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This smells like some kind of bias. Find a measuring error in one situation and then project the maximum error onto everything.

Any statisticians here, is there a name for this?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

The title is, unsurprisingly, heavily exaggerated. The study does not claim there are "billions more people". They studied 307 different dam construction projects around the word, and found the actual number of affected people in those rural areas was like 40-80% higher than estimated.

Their conclusion is that it's likely the population of the world is quite underestimated, but they don't want to guess by how much, that's all cooked up by the "journalist".

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This smells like

Don't get too scientific now.

It's just a study. Like many others. All studies are biased in some way. A proper scientific study can question status quo and or provide alternate views or methods.

In the end most scientists find 8 B people a reasonable and probable amount. But they don't know, as those are estimates. The guys from this new study just used a different approach and come up with maybe 1B more.

Original publication Nature