this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
72 points (100.0% liked)

Games

18313 readers
851 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 7 points 6 days ago (14 children)

Why do you think Gamestop is obligated to pay publishers? I don’t expect my local used book store to kick back royalties on used copies.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 4 points 6 days ago (13 children)

Well, that'd be on account of the previous part, where they're self-dealing by selling the games at full price, re-purchasing them for pennies and then reselling them for near-full price again.

Here's how weird the past twenty years have been: I can't tell if you're too young to remember how messed up their entire business model was or you're an older guy who has had their brain rot rewired from "Gamestop clearly sucks" and into "but we like ownership of physical media instead of the glorified rentals of digital distribution".

Because let me tell you, those two things can both suck at the same time. You really don't need to take sides here.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Gamestop has always sucked, but nothing unethical about a business of buy low sell high on used goods.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 3 points 6 days ago

There's nothing intrinsically unethical about buying and selling used goods, and all buying and selling as a business needs to turn some profit.

There is absolutely a TON unethical with how Gamestop's model went about it. From their iron grip on shelf space to their aggressive pushing of preordering to avoid having to keep any stock whatsoever to their pricing structure and targeting of kids and students in a space where reselling of this particular type of used goods was not easily handled online and as a result had next to zero upwards pressure on price.

This argument superficially makes sense in a world of used game sales as fundamentally a collector's business mediated by online logistics companies for door-to-door sales, but that wasn't Gamestop's world. Gamestop existed in a world where they controlled both the first sale and all subsequent resales after having driven a bunch of smaller businesses to residual status by leveraging all the used sales money into a competitive advantage against both them and game publishers.

It sucked. It was an entirely parasytic model designed to syphon money away from everybody involved by virtue of controlling real estate. Their demise is one of very few silver linings in the world of "you own nothing" digital distribution.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)