this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1779 readers
19 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last weeks thread here

Welcome to this week’s casual kōrero thread!

This post will be pinned in this community so you can always find it, and will stay for about a week until replaced by the next one.

It’s for talking about anything that might not justify a full post. For example:

  • Something interesting that happened to you
  • Something humourous that happened to you
  • Something frustrating that happened to you
  • A quick question
  • A request for recommendations
  • Pictures of your pet
  • A picture of a cloud that kind of looks like an elephant
  • Anything else, there are no rules (except the rule)

So how’s it going?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I just don’t understand the mentality of a business saying “we don’t want to talk to our customers”.

Money. They worked out the customers lost from this add up to less than the cost of having a short wait time.

Seems like this could be done easily, even easier with email.

Realistically it's actually pretty difficult to identify exactly which individual houses are affected and them map that against customer accounts and then send an email to them all within a short time. I don't see any reason why it should be that way, though. If they had their system set up so customers were previously mapped against certain local cables, cabinets, etc then they could identify the problem spot and trigger an email to all the potentially affected people. But again, such efforts would cost money. And I'd argue that money is better spent on reducing the number of outages.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Money. They worked out the customers lost from this add up to less than the cost of having a short wait time.

If there is not a monopoly a business that provides better customer support should win in the marketplace.

regarding the second point. They already know the addresses of all their customers right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For emailing customers, it's not about their addresses but working out who is affected. Remember the ISPs don't run the internet lines (largely this is Chorus). This is assuming they even know what the issue is early enough to tell people. By the time they work out where the issue is it may only be 2 minutes until service is restored.

In terms if the marketplace thing, we don't actually have that much competition. Many of the medium sized companies are owned by one of the three big telcos.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Chorus has a map showing the outages and who is effected. Same for powerco.

It is my experience neither chorus nor powerco can fix any outage in less than six hours. My ISP says any outage will be fixed between 24 and 48 hours. They will not promise less than that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

If it's really a case of Chorus providing a map and they just have to run their database of customers against the Chorus data... then there is really no excuse.