this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
498 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

24653 readers
1009 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

Thankfully never got sucked into that void. I had a coworker who really evangelized functional programming. I wonder what he's up to now.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

We have a principal engineer on our team that is pushing this sort of style, hard.

It's essentially obfuscation, no one else on the team can really review, nevermind understand and maintain what they write. It's all just functional abstractions on top of abstractions, every little thing is a function, even property/field access is extracted out to a function instead of just.... Using dot notation like a normal person.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

even property/field access is extracted out to a function

Java, the most functional programming language there is.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, this is in JS to be clear

Instead of

const name = user.name

It's

const userToName(user) => user.name;

const name = userToName(user);

Ad nauseum.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I was afraid you’d say that. That’s stupid.

Do they give a reason for why that’s ‘necessary’?

(Also it should be const userToName = (user) => user.name;)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)