this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
915 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45319 readers
3785 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Right, but that would not make sense

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That's because you're not thinking like Putin. Starting this war in the first place was the worst possible idea that never made any sense, except it allowed Putin to reform the slipping grip on the country and cemented his regime and his vision for at least some time. But just like the empires of old, now his regime requires constant slow boiling war to operate.
He will happily sacrifice every Russian to this, he can easily afford losing a thousand men per day to the grinder. It costs very little to him. European countries on the other hand will be very very hurt by the war on their territory, and everyone understands it.

[–] Renohren@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Interesting to note that since 2022, he lost under 1% of his population to the war... Meat attacks could go on for years on end and it would barely move him.

You got to get him out of the picture to have this war end. Yes I know : there's probably worse than him coming next but I doubt there is anybody more frightening to an opposition than him coming.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

he lost under 1% of his population to the war

This is not entirely accurate figure. The 1% is only the number of people confirmed dead by the independent sources like Mediazona. The number of people who are "missing in action" but just can't be confirmed dead is staggeringly more than that. Also don't forget that that's mostly people of productive age and demographic, which skews the metrics a little. Also add to it all the people who left the country, which are also of the most productive demographics.

That being said, Russia is big, and meat attacks could indeed go on for years. It will be devastating for Russia, but not for Putin.

there’s probably worse than him coming next

That's the scary scenario, but there is also a bunch of boring technocrats that might be put in place by the oligarchy, which sounds great in comparison.

[–] djsp@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago

Interesting to note that since 2022, he lost under 1% of his population to the war... Meat attacks could go on for years on end and it would barely move him.

If that "1% of his population" refers to the general population, I would note that the total includes many people who could never fight, such as:

  • all those involved, whether directly or indirectly, in the development and production of military hardware,
  • all those involved, whether directly or indirectly, in the extraction and trade of natural resources, without which the Russian economy would collapse, and
  • all those physically unable to fight, such as children, the elderly and disabled people, and all those who care for them in one way or another.

As much as Putin's tyranny may yet squeeze out of the general population, 1% in three years is already devastating, in my view.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago

Not long ago, a Russian politician was asking women to dress "less modestly" in order to have more kids, so they know they can't keep it going that long

[–] seeigel@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

Starting this war in the first place was the worst possible idea that never made any sense

It made sense to the NATO strategists who recommended to not expand NATO further, because of that war.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 1 points 3 days ago

Interesting stance