this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
882 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69391 readers
2573 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It garbles advertisers' data as a result, but you must disable uBlock Origin to run it; they can't work simultaneously. I recently moved to it and, so far, am never looking back!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 142 points 3 weeks ago (51 children)

Couple of issues I'm wondering about...

First, wouldn't clicking on everything just make you easier to track?

Second, how much bandwidth would all this use?

[–] [email protected] 178 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (42 children)
  1. not in this way
  2. not enough to matter

the way it works is sending an HTTP request that registers as a "click" to the advertiser (thus costing them money), but then doesn't actually let the browser download any content and fetch the webpage, basically pi-holes the destination site and any attached tracking cookies. Combined with the fact that it does this to every ad, it would basically poison any click tracking.

edit: pedants

and before I get any more of you, this is just what I remember reading about adnauseam, do not take it as gospel, go look at AdNauseam's FAQ.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (40 children)

none

Ah great

it works [by] sending an HTTP request that registers as a "click" to the advertiser

Uh, wait a minute. 🤔

Sending a request also uses bandwidth, you know.

[–] [email protected] 144 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A basic GET request, even with a long querystring, will be negligible even on a 1998 dial-up connection.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Right, but thousands of them, possibly every day? Could perhaps affect your data consumption on your phone e.g. 🤷‍♂️

Edit: I got it guys, thanks.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know of any data plan that limits on the upload. Caps are usually on the download side, and TFA says it does not download the server response.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You aren't terribly familiar with how much traffic we generate nowadays... are you? If we were still on 2G and isdn / dsl sure. You'd likely see a slight latency jump. On anything from this last decade+ ? Not a chance.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not, am I. I hadn't done any calculations regarding this. It was strictly hypothetical, as you can probably tell from the question mark and 🤷‍♂️. 👍

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'll be honest - you weren't really presenting your case in that way. Understand my confusion: you seemed pretty adamant about your concern with no backing data on it. Most people pick their hills with something to back them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not really a hill for me to begin with lol.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's kind of my point - just based on the reception it's clear that a number of people were perceiving that as one. Normally that's the "pump the brakes" or the "hol up 🖐️🖐️" moment where you clarify.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Gotcha. 👉👉

load more comments (38 replies)
load more comments (39 replies)
load more comments (47 replies)